W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Documenting implicit assumptions?

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:33:43 +0100
Message-Id: <260D2AF6-C02A-40C6-842D-253FE79E9079@bblfish.net>
To: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>

On 1 Feb 2011, at 00:07, Peter Williams wrote:
> Here is one attempt that took me less than 30m. It captures something of things I dont like about Henry's conception - understanding that its just a strawman.
> http://yorkporc.wordpress.com/2011/01/29/foafssl-variation-secure-following-theorem-crt-files/

If you propose it I'd suggest opening a new thread. There you can add the following
to help people along: 
  - I don't see a section explaining why this is useful. That should come at the top. 
  - What does this protocol gain us over what we have now? 
  - Adding a UML Sequence diagram too would help understanding.

Anyway, no need to look at it too deeply if it's just a off the cuff thing you
wrote down on a piece of paper and have no serious intention to work on further.
I can already see about 5 issues I would have with it by perusing it quickly, one
of which is massive increase in complexity.

Received on Monday, 31 January 2011 23:34:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:41 UTC