- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:59:59 +0000
- To: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>
- CC: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
> Does the W3C issue tracker work the same way, or is it based scanning the > content (vs headers) of the emails for certain tags, only? Read http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/ ... Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com> > Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:46:12 -0800 > To: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org> > Subject: RE: WebID-ISSUE-4 (bblfish): Detail Authorization "protocol" using > WebID > Resent-From: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:49:12 +0000 > > > Some groups get upset when I do what Ive done in this email: respond to X > topic with something related - but only just. Those groups are often using > email headers and threads as their issue tracking mechanism. It requires > certain user behaviour to work, and easy compliance may well assume > researcher-type tool chains and researcher-grade discipline when handling > email. > > Does the W3C issue tracker work the same way, or is it based scanning the > content (vs headers) of the emails for certain tags, only? > > I remember spending about a year promoting the use of S/MIME in web-based > email user agents in the days when this notion - which does away with > SMTP/POP3/IMAP - was not popular. Least to say, it took a lot of work to > legitimize what we now take for granted. in that vein, to best get in the > mindset of W3C, should I perhaps work with W3C project/groupware tools that > are website based - staying away from mailing list type tools, interactions > and culture? > >> To: public-xg-webid@w3.org >> From: sysbot+tracker@w3.org >> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:17:58 +0000 >> Subject: WebID-ISSUE-4 (bblfish): Detail Authorization "protocol" using WebID >> >> >> WebID-ISSUE-4 (bblfish): Detail Authorization "protocol" using WebID >> >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/4 >> >> Raised by: Henry Story >> On product: >> >> Doing some of what OAuth does using WebID seems to require not much more than >> adding one relation to a Personal Profile document, and having servers use >> WebID authentication. >> >> A very initial idea of how this can work was written up in the blog post >> "Sketch of a RESTful photo Printing service with foaf+ssl" >> >> http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/sketch_of_a_restful_photo >> >> >> Some research is being done on this to extend. It would require some >> implementations. >> >> We need to compare the possibilities enabled by this to what is done with >> OAuth, the same way we have worked on comparisons with OpenID. >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 18:00:35 UTC