Re: ACL from Reto Bachmann-Gmür on 2011-01-25 (public-xg-webid@w3.org from January 2011)

From: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@gmuer.ch>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:47:22 +0100
To: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
Cc: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, nathan@webr3.org, WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinAtG5jOsXnH59MNY_HZ6OD3Z4heoZNa9vT_FAF@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Alexandre Passant
<alexandre.passant@deri.org> wrote:
> My feeling is that we could get WebID (authentication) without ACL issues.
> What people do when the user is authenticated (e.g. use ACL ontology to deliver X or Y) is IMO a matter of the implementation, not of WebID itself.

I completely agree. WebId is about authentication, authorization is
out of scope.

Reto

Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2011 19:47:54 UTC