- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:02:10 +0100
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Not sure. I think WebID spec and testing interoperability of WebID implementations is core, as well as issues in browsers that we can see that could improve things. ACLs are not far from the core, and may even be needed to get implementations going a bit beyond the simplest point. They may even be needed for testing. Every little thing we add can create a huge amount of workload. So we have to be careful :-) For example standardising ACLs could end up require work comparing all kinds of ACLs ontologies, not an easy task. Perhaps the question to ask is: where does not having ACLs start creating interoperability limitations for WebID implementations? Ie, how far can we go without them? Henry On 25 Jan 2011, at 19:42, Nathan wrote: > Hi All, > > Quick scope check, is ACL, like http://esw.w3.org/WebAccessControl under the scope of this IG? > > Best, > > Nathan > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2011 19:02:46 UTC