Re: [foaf-protocols] Read-Write Web -- a W3C Community Group

I just cast my vote as well, for #1.
Andrei

On 08/17/11 17:32, Jeff Sayre wrote:
> As Kingsley suggested, I just cast my vote for #1. Also, both Kingsley and
> I--as well as other WebID supporters--are already part of the Web Payments
> Community Group.
>
>> On 8/17/11 10:25 AM, Dominik Tomaszuk wrote:
>>> On 17.08.2011 13:32, Henry Story wrote:
>>>> Excellent news. Having different groups develop different parts of
>>>> the stack is the right thing to do.
>>> There are also two groups close to WebID:
>>> 1. Uncertainty, Trust and the Semantic Web Community Group -
>>> http://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/
>>> 2. Web Payments Community Group -
>>> http://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/
>>>
>>> Dominik
>>>
>>>
>> Others: we should cast votes for #1. #2 is already functional. There
>> needs to be a minimum of 5 votes for it to go live.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kingsley Idehen
>> President&   CEO
>> OpenLink Software
>> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2011 15:45:26 UTC