- From: Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@gmu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:41:04 -0400
- To: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>, gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@gmu.edu>, mkokar@ece.neu.edu
- Cc: public-xg-urw3@w3.org
Mitch, If you send me an HTML file with the images embedded so that they display on the page itself, then I will post it on the XG web page and put a link to it on the wiki. I agree with Vipul that a text version would be helpful. A bulleted list with indents for sub-categories would be good. K At 10:33 AM -0400 6/15/07, Kashyap, Vipul wrote: >Mitch, > >I was wondering if you could list the various categories in text on the wiki >page? > >That will make it easier for all of us. > >Thanks, > >---Vipul > >======================================= >Vipul Kashyap, Ph.D. >Senior Medical Informatician >Clinical Informatics R&D, Partners HealthCare System >Phone: (781)416-9254 >Cell: (617)943-7120 >http://www.partners.org/cird/AboutUs.asp?cBox=Staff&stAb=vik > >To keep up you need the right answers; to get ahead you need the >right questions >---John Browning and Spencer Reiss, Wired 6.04.95 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-xg-urw3-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-urw3-request@w3.org] >> On Behalf Of Kashyap, Vipul >> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 10:25 AM >> To: gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr; Kathryn Blackmond Laskey; mkokar@ece.neu.edu >> Cc: public-xg-urw3@w3.org >> Subject: RE: Uncertainty Ontology >> >> >> >> I would propose that instead of cluttering people's e-mail, we should add >> our >> comments directly on the wiki page.. >> >> This will be the best way to exchange ideas. The biggest advantage being >> that if >> someone else has already said something similar, you can do +1 to it... >> >> My point of disagreement with Mitch was the following: >> >> I view Bayesian networks, Fuzzy Logic, Dempster Schaeffer, etc. as >> representation/reasoning tools on uncertain information. >> So the proposal was: let's have two classes in the ontology: >> - Uncertainty >> - Techniques for dealing with Uncertainty... >> >> Mitch seemed to suggest that these things categorized different types of >> uncertainty, though in my mind, given a piece of uncertain information, I >> can >> use any of the above techniques (possibly inappropriately) to represent >> and >> reason with it. >> >> ... Will post this on the wiki soon... >> >> ---Vipul >> >> ======================================= >> Vipul Kashyap, Ph.D. >> Senior Medical Informatician >> Clinical Informatics R&D, Partners HealthCare System >> Phone: (781)416-9254 >> Cell: (617)943-7120 >> http://www.partners.org/cird/AboutUs.asp?cBox=Staff&stAb=vik >> >> To keep up you need the right answers; to get ahead you need the right >> questions >> ---John Browning and Spencer Reiss, Wired 6.04.95 >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr [mailto:gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr] >> > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 10:17 AM >> > To: Kathryn Blackmond Laskey; Giorgos Stoilos; mkokar@ece.neu.edu; >> > Kashyap, Vipul >> > Cc: public-xg-urw3@w3.org >> > Subject: Re: Uncertainty Ontology >> > >> > >> > I know that. That's why I did not send this mail as a reply to Paulo's >> > one. >> > >> > I just remember some specific discussion, I think it was Vipul >> questioning >> > about something about the differences on the types of uncertainties, >> > taking >> > place during the telecon. I also remember someone saying: "...discuss >> over >> > mail with Vipul and then summarize to the group." I wanted to make sure >> if >> > I >> > lister correctly or there is going to be a public discussion over mail >> > about >> > this issue, cause I haven't seen any mail so far (beware that Paulo's >> mail >> > was >> > *not* about the specific issue but about the uncertainty ontology in >> > general). >> > >> > Greetings, >> > -gstoil >> > >> > Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@gmu.edu> said: >> > >> > > Paulo was referring to Mitch's preliminary draft ontology of >> > > uncertainty, which he posted to the Wiki: >> > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/urw3/wiki/UncertaintyOntology >> > > >> > > At 11:05 AM +0300 6/15/07, Giorgos Stoilos wrote: > > > > >Hi all, >> > > > >> > > >Is the discussion about the differences on the types of >> > > >uncertainties, that took place on the telecon, taking place, or it >> > > >hasn't started yet? I believe that it would be very helpful for the >> > > >entire group to participate. >> > > > >> > > >Best, >> > > >-gstoil >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended >> only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain >> confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, >> dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon >> this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient >> is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact >> the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this >> information. >> >> > > > > > > >The information transmitted in this electronic communication is >intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and >may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, >retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any >action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities >other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received >this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at >800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 14:39:27 UTC