- From: Markus Stocker <markus.stocker@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 06:59:33 +0000
- To: Alexandra Kokkinaki <alexandra.kokkinaki@gmail.com>, public-xg-ssn@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACidGneXxYamxarRknrqV0j8ef_z3AC0AFy83D6oJ_qVm3zFOw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Alexandra, On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:35 AM Alexandra Kokkinaki < alexandra.kokkinaki@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > could you please help on that? I want to describe sensing devices > consisting of sensors in RDF with the help of ssn ontology. > Sounds like you have a System [1] with sensors (possibly sensing devices) as sub systems [2]. > Each sensing device will have many serial numbers and each sensor will > also have several serial numbers. > Note that a sensor is "any entity that can follow a sensing method" [3] and can include a lab technician who follows a protocol to measure a property while a sensing device is an instrument. A sensing device is a sensor, while a sensor may be a physical object other than a device. I think I would model serial numbers for systems, which will also work for sensing devices. > So I was thinking of creating a class for each type of sensing device > under SensingDevice class and a class for each type of sensor under Sensor > class. > Then publish this ontology with the new classes. > Then create a new file only for the instances, which will import the new > ontology. > Looks like a sensible approach, especially if you want the first ontology with your classes to be reusable. Cheers, Markus [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/ssnx/ssn#System [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/ssnx/ssn#hasSubSystem [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/ssnx/ssn#Sensor > Is this the correct way to go? > > Thanks, > > Alexandra >
Received on Friday, 11 September 2015 07:00:10 UTC