- From: Krzysztof Janowicz <jano@psu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:07:02 -0500
- To: Michael Compton <Michael.Compton@csiro.au>, Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>, "public-xg-ssn@w3.org" <public-xg-ssn@w3.org>
and the pattern as such, i.e., the skeleton, can be expressed in OWL2 EL. Krzysztof On 11/08/2010 06:51 PM, Michael Compton wrote: > Protege reports the language required for the sensor ontology (with > DUL) as SRIQ(D). > > For the sensor ontology alone (i.e. no DUL), I don't think we use the > qualified number restrictions or the datatypes, so it's a simpler > logic; however, you would want to use those things in any example > using the ontology. Nominals are also pretty useful. So most things > that use the ontology would end up using SROIQ(D) - the WM30 example I > did for the wiki does. > > Michael > > > > On 08/11/2010, at 11:34 , Alexandre Passant wrote: > >> >> On 8 Nov 2010, at 07:43, Michael Compton wrote: >> >>> Nice work. Good to see that we can (almost) pass these various >>> validation tools. >>> >>> I think we should we add links in the report (say in the intro or >>> conclusion of either the whole report or the ontology section) for >>> these >> >> Good idea. And since the first one is Linked-Data oriented, that's >> also a good way to outreach the ontology to the LOD community. >> >>> and indicate how the ontology passes through pellet lint. >> >> As a matter of interest, what's its OWL sub-language / dialect ? >> >> Alex. >> >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 08/11/2010, at 9:11 , Alexandre Passant wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I've made a few sanity tests to check the current SSN ontology >>>> >>>> * Compliance with the LOD principles, using Vapour [1] >>>> >>>> Some tests fail here. >>>> >>>> http://validator.linkeddata.org/vapour?vocabUri=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.oclc.org%2FNET%2Fssnx%2Fssn&classUri=http%3A%2F%2F&propertyUri=http%3A%2F%2F&instanceUri=http%3A%2F%2F&defaultResponse=dontmind&userAgent=vapour.sourceforge.net >>>> >>>> >>>> - 1st request while dereferencing resource URI without specifying >>>> the desired content type (HTTP response code should be 303 >>>> (redirect)):Failed >>>> => AFAIK, purl allows to specify a 303 rather than a 302 when >>>> redirecting, so that should be easy to fix >>>> >>>> - 2nd request while dereferencing resource URI without specifying >>>> the desired content type (Content type should be >>>> 'application/rdf+xml'):Failed >>>> => That can be fixed on the /2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/images/3/36/ >>>> folder with a .htaccess file, containing >>>> >>>> AddType application/rdf+xml .xml >>>> >>>> * Semantic / syntactic validation, using Sindice inspector [2] >>>> >>>> 100% OK >>>> >>>> http://inspector.sindice.com/inspect?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.oclc.org%2FNET%2Fssnx%2Fssn&content=&doTriplesValidation=1&doSyntaxValidation=1 >>>> >>>> >>>> Hope that helps, >>>> >>>> Alex. >>>> >>>> [1] http://validator.linkeddata.org/ >>>> [2] http://inspector.sindice.com/ >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Alexandre Passant >>>> Digital Enterprise Research Institute >>>> National University of Ireland, Galway >>>> :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> . >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Dr. Alexandre Passant >> Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> National University of Ireland, Galway >> :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> . >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- Krzysztof Janowicz GeoVISTA Center, Department of Geography, 302 Walker Building Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Email: jano@psu.edu Webpage: http://www.personal.psu.edu/kuj13/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 00:07:40 UTC