- From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@uni-muenster.de>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:26:43 +0200
- To: public-xg-ssn@w3.org
Hi, Has anybody used ContentCVS? According to the website it is a 'CVS-based Collaborative ONTology ENgineering Tool' --> http://krono.act.uji.es/people/Ernesto/contentcvs Kind regards Krzysztof Rodrigo Garcia Acevedo schrieb: > Hi All. > > I'm not an expert on licensing issues or W3C processes, but as far as I know, W3C standards follow the W3C Patent Policy [1] in order to ensure that Recommendations can be implemented on a Royalty-Free basis. I don't know whether this applies to Incubator Groups' works, but maybe it is worth checking this issue before choosing the license for the ontology. > > Does anybody know something about this matter? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy/ > > Kind regards, > Rodrigo. > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org] En nombre de Raúl García Castro > Enviado el: viernes, 17 de julio de 2009 8:28 > Para: public-xg-ssn@w3.org > CC: public-xg-ssn@w3.org > Asunto: Re: SSN-XG Meeting Minutes 15-July-2009 > > On 17/7/09 Holger.Neuhaus@csiro.au wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Great discussion! It's almost weekend, so just a few remarks ;-) >> >> I think that we can start off with using sourceforge or similar as >> repository for our files that everyone has access to (as a "quick" >> solution, considering the time we have left). However, to some extend >> I do share Kerry's concern here... Maybe (until we have that license >> issue figured out) we should even consider a non-public space >> (probably close enough to have it at SF and not distribute the link >> ;-) ? >> > > But, then, maybe we don't even need sorceforge right now and we can > manage putting the files in the wiki. > We can worry about sourceforge when we plan to release a first version > of the ontology. > > >> In the meantime, we can look for a repository-based solution. >> >> I very much prefer the URL 'http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/' >> for the ontology; I have CVS access to that space (that's how W3C >> handles it; this way, we get at least that ascii-type of versioning >> for the 'releases'), so that I'd be happy to do the whole release >> management-stuff Krzysztof was talking about. >> > > I totally agree in having that URL for the ontology. > > it is the approach followed for other ontologies developed in the W3C, > such as the Delivery Context ontology: > http://www.w3.org/TR/dcontology/deliveryContextAll.owl > or the same RDF(S) and OWL specifications: > http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema > http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl > > Kind regards, > > -- Krzysztof Janowicz Institut für Geoinformatik Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster Weseler Straße 253 D-48151 Münster fon: 0049 - 251 - 83 39764 fax: 0049 - 251 - 83 39763 janowicz@uni-muenster.de http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de/~janowicz 'Die Wahrheit ist das Kind der Zeit, nicht der Autorität' (Bertolt Brecht)
Received on Friday, 17 July 2009 20:27:21 UTC