- From: John Graybeal <graybeal@mbari.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:36:35 -0600
- To: public-xg-ssn@w3.org
From past minutes and today's telecon, I could not tell if the group had a particular goal for reviewing and including observations ontologies in the discussion. (I can see everyone thought it was a good idea, but not what purpose they thought this would serve.) Can someone clarify how we want to use any observation ontology that might be identified or created? For example, do we know we need an ontology, or will it be enough just to have a list of phenomena? John -------------- John Graybeal <mailto:graybeal@marinemetadata.org>
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 14:37:28 UTC