- From: Victor Manuel Pelaez Martinez <victor.pelaez@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:31:51 +0200
- To: <public-xg-ssn@w3.org>
Dear All, For a normal week all the new time slots proposed are good for me, but as I said, next week I'm travelling and I will not be able to connect. In my opinion we should not delay the first meeting more, so if those options are good for the group then I think that the meeting should take place (I could read the meeting minutes and introduce myself in the second meeting). Best Regards, Víctor M. Peláez Fundación CTIC Departamento de I+D+i victor.pelaez@fundacionctic.org Tfno: +34 984 29 12 12 Fax: +34 984 39 06 12 Parque Científico Tecnológico Gijón - Asturias - Spain www.fundacionctic.org -----Mensaje original----- De: public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org] En nombre de Amit Parashar Enviado el: miércoles, 01 de abril de 2009 19:28 Para: public-xg-ssn@w3.org Asunto: Re: Meeting time for first meeting SSN XG Dear Participants, I would like us all to be able to meet for the first meeting at least during the late time slot. I know the timings are awkward for some of us more than others. There are some other solutions available including: 1. having two meetings a week - accommodating for different time zones and then have the requirement for coordination between the two 2. having a much later meeting for Australia/Asia - 12 midnight, which generally gives a reasonable time slot for EU/US participants. 3. we can also have a rolling action item to discuss the date of the next meeting at the each meeting, therefore those who are going to come can decide. There are a number of options we could pursue, and we can discuss this at the meeting. With respect to the meeting, I think this week's time slot's are not getting full attendance, I suggest that we pick a day next week with the options being: 1. 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th of April at either 14:00 GMT, 15:00 GMT (12 midnight / 1 AM Australia time) 2. 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th of April at either 8:00 AM GMT, 9:00 AM GMT - This would be a reasonable hour for everyone possibly including the US as it would be 5 AM/ 6AM East Coast time. My preference is for the GMT AM time slots, however our partners are Wright State will have log on a little earlier that morning :) To check the time in your city, please click on the following URL and modify the dates. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?year=2009&month=4&day=7&p1=31&p2=43&p3=57&p4=235 The 10th is Easter (Good Friday) and a public holiday in many countries including Australia. Regards, Amit On 01/04/2009, at 6:47 PM, Kevin R. Page wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 22:07 +0200, Victor Manuel Pelaez Martinez wrote: > For the rest of the meetings I would prefer the morning options that > were presented last week because it would be difficult for me to > connect at 20:00 GMT (22:00 CEST it's a little bit late for me). As far as a regular meeting slot goes, obviously office hours local time would be ideal. Going earlier, 07:30 local (06:30 GMT) onwards on weekdays is fine, but I suspect this won't work for our colleagues in the US. Weekdays are fine finishing up to 19:00 local (18:00 GMT), except Thursdays 17:00 GMT latest. If it has to be later in the evenings, some variation would help. Fridays evenings are regularly susceptible to weekend travel, Thursdays are out except in August and September. Tuesdays would be best in July through September. Apart from that no evening is ideal if it's going to be the same one for a year; I can prioritise the telecons with warning (>1 week), but variation would mitigate the inevitable clashes! Regards, Kevin -- Kevin R. Page krp@ecs.soton.ac.uk http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/info/people/krp Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia University of Southampton, UK
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 08:32:38 UTC