- From: Mischa Tuffield <mischa.tuffield@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 17:16:01 +0100
- To: Paul Trevithick <ptrevithick@gmail.com>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, "public-xg-socialweb@w3.org" <public-xg-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <CDAFC140-54C3-4F9C-9826-4CD22FAEFACF@garlik.com>
Hi All, <snip/> On 6 Oct 2010, at 17:12, Paul Trevithick wrote: > Harry, > > I just noticed something at the 11th hour: > > In this para: > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/FinalReport#Identity > There is this sentence: > > A identity provider (also called identity selectors) is a social platform that manages and accesses identities over multiple other social platforms and applications. > > The sentence has the effect of assigning the term "identity provider" a meaning that conflicts BOTH with how that term is widely used within the identity/security community AND with how the term is used in the rest of the report. > > In the identity/security community an identity provider is simply a single service that provides a set of claims/attributes (possibly including an identifier claim). For example, an OpenID "OP" would be considered an IdP. > > The meaning assigned in the sentence above moves far beyond the traditional definition of IdP to make it something that spans multiple platforms and apps. > > As a consequence, anyone familiar with the identity provider term will find the above sentence off-putting, and disorienting. > > SUGGESTION > > In order to minimize any other changes to the report, replace the above sentence with: > > A identity provider is a service (e.g. an OpenID identity provider) that provides a set of attributes about a person, often including an identifier attribute (e.g. the OpenID identifier itself). FWIW, I am happy to make this change when I go through and perform my current edits, if no-one objects I will make the change which Paul has suggested, and will try and make the language consistent throughout the rest of the document. Regards, Mischa > > --Paul > > On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Harry Halpin wrote: > >> Everyone, >> >> I did some final edits to the report. I still haven't gotten slide >> 16 from DanBri's slidedeck, and gone through Alex Passant's changes >> yet (will try to get to these tomorrow) - but overall it's very close >> to done. I'm sending it out to our various invited speakers for >> comments now, and we'll be talking about it tomorrow. The agenda is >> basically unchanged from last meeting. So, if you haven't had time to >> read over the final report and make changes, *now* is the time, >> because we have to publish soon. The goal is to have all suggested >> edits by Friday, and I'll go through them and then produce a new HTML >> version on Saturday. >> >> Final Report: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/FinalReport >> >> SWXG WG Weekly >> >> 1. Convene [2]SWXG WG meeting of 2010-09-29T14:30-17:00GMT (See >> your [3]local time, i.e. 16:00 London, 11:00 Boston) >> + [4]Zakim teleconference bridge: Boston, USA: >> [5]+1.617.761.6200 code:SWXG Nice, France: >> [6]+33.4.89.06.34.99 code:SWXG Bristol, UK: >> [7]+44.117.370.6152 code:SWXG ([8]zakim calendar) >> o supplementary IRC chat: [9]#swxg on irc.w3.org port >> 6665 >> + chair: hhalpin >> + scribe: bblfish >> + roll call, comments on the agenda. >> + PROPOSED: to approve minutes from [10]Sept 29th meeting. >> + PROPOSED: Last meeting, but everyone invited to keep >> participating through the Federated Social Web effort! >> >> 2. Final Report Rough Draft: The latest (and hopefully, by time of >> meeting, last)rough draft is on the wiki. >> > ___________________________________ Mischa Tuffield PhD Email: mischa.tuffield@garlik.com Homepage - http://mmt.me.uk/ Garlik Limited, 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW +44(0)845 652 2824 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2010 16:17:15 UTC