- From: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 17:58:58 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, David Recordon <recordond@gmail.com>, "public-xg-socialweb@w3.org" <public-xg-socialweb@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Marie-Claire Forgue <mcf@w3.org>, Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, "jacobi@csail.mit.edu" <jacobi@csail.mit.edu>, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
> I might be a minority on this point (wasn't at WWW2010) but I still > would like to explore further the use of a more thing-centric RDF > representation, ie. with subject of statements not being the page. Not > every site will want this, but others (eg. RottenTomatoes, BestBuy, > Drupal, ...) are already exploring more extensive use of RDFa and may > prefer a cleaner model. It should be possible to support (and > validate, and consume, ...) both idioms and to leave some > level-of-detail questions to the market / publishers / grassroots / > pick-your-metaphor... > > +1 Even using the value of og:url would be better than using the URL of the page, because at least it's a canonical URL. Cheers, Peter
Received on Saturday, 1 May 2010 22:00:42 UTC