Re: [diso-project] What would be the common requirements of a "distributed Social Network" project

Hello Alexandre (and others on the Diso-project mailing list),

there's a group of folks over in the W3C also working towards the 
design/architecture of social network future. The group (of which I'm a 
member) is called the Social Web Incubator Group. It started a year ago.

You can read a (perhaps) somewhat dusty mission statement (Incubator 
group charter) page here: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/charter

I'm bringing this up because over the past year we've had a couple of 
initiatives which focused on the topic of social web use cases. I think 
the most current page (it's been through several iterations and I think 
this is the most current/compiled version) is found here:

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/RequirementsAndUseCases-WorkArea 


If you want to use the content/concepts of this page or its precursor 
(http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories), they are 
in the public domain and the SWXG would WELCOME all inputs and 
activities to help us to bring them to the next stage of wide 
acceptance/use.

To edit the wiki page on which the use cases and requirements appear one 
must be a member of W3C or an invited expert. But, don't let that deter 
you, the requirement for invited experts would certainly be met by 
thought leaders and participants of the Diso project.

Please see more info about joining this incubator here: 
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/#Joining

We also have a public mailing list. I'm cross posting this memo to the 
SocialWeb XG list but I don't know if you can post to it before you are 
a member or expert status. Anyway, there's a public archive here: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-socialweb/

Each week we have a conference call (on Wednesday). The conference calls 
are generally 30 minutes of group activity and 30 minutes with guest 
speaker/invited talk on a topic related to the Social Web and our charter.

To review minutes of our past meetings, please visit this page: 
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/#Minutes

Chris Messina joined us to talk about ActivityStreams in December 2009. 
See http://www.w3.org/2009/12/02-swxg-minutes.html

last week (March 3) we had Tim Berners-Lee sharing his thoughts with us. 
http://www.w3.org/2010/03/03-swxg-minutes.html

I hope you'll accept this invitation to visit these pages and to let us 
(the SWXG) know how the work to which I've directed you might be 
advanced with the assistance of those on the Diso project.

Regards,

-- 
Christine

Spime Wrangler

cperey@perey.com
mobile +41 79 436 68 69
VoIP (from US) +1 (617) 848-8159
Skype (from anywhere) Christine_Perey


ineation wrote:
> Hello there,
> 
> My name is Alexandre Eisenchteter (ineation) and I am working with a
> bunch of people on some project related to distributed technologies
> and social networks. I've just subscribed to the group after being a
> silent observer.
> 
> I see that there are plenty of initiatives around the concept of
> "distributed Social Network". Each with different approach to the
> problem, which is good because diversity is good for innovation.
> 
> Many of these approaches are driven by technology (so we are at my
> company). This is why I was wondering if we could take a user
> perspective and identify what would be the common set of user
> requirements (user stories?) that these projects should fulfill. I
> guess it evolve around concept such as liberty, privacy, ownership.
> But could we be more specific ? I guess this work may also have done
> somewhere...
> 
> I also feel that many users (normal not geeks) do not perceived the
> need for such technology. Which is key if we want users to use
> alternatives to monopolistic platforms. In order to have better
> insights, we have launched studies to better understand how normal web
> user perceive privacy concerns and how they need and use personal data
> portability. I would be pleased to share the results with this group,
> as soon as we have some.
>

Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 13:27:19 UTC