- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:35:53 +0100
- To: public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <9178f78c1002270835q301707f1r2d3c4ad06e7c8d85@mail.gmail.com>
Quite an interesting article. In particular, there's a reference to the term 'social web' . Not sure I agree with everything, but it's a good read. http://jeffsayre.com/2010/02/24/a-flock-of-twitters-decentralized-semantic-microblogging/ *What might a truly connected Social Web look like? * This image is a tracing of all the Internet traffic circa late 2006. It is licensed under a Creative Commons License (by-nc-sa/1.0) and created by http://opte.org/ ( http://jeffsayre.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Internet_traffic-300x300.jpg) Where would the big social networks appear on this graph? Twitter would be a single point in this image with a few tenuous tendrils extending out representing the limited access that Twitter allows to their data silos via their proprietary APIs. There would be no lines representing conversations between users as the totality of conversation all occurs within the walled-off Twitter space. The same holds true for Facebook, Google Buzz, FriendFeed, LinkedIn, and many of the other social networks. The lines connecting these services would be nothing more than gossamer strands representing the brute-force pushing of limited duplicate content between these data silos. You might be thinking that conversations regularly occur between users of these platforms. For instance, I can choose to show my latest tweets on Facebook or LinkedIn, I can choose to display my latest Facebook or LinkedIn status updates on Twitter, and so forth. But these are not conversations. They are just snapshots of conversation that are occurring within other data silos.
Received on Saturday, 27 February 2010 16:36:28 UTC