- From: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:42:07 +0100
- To: cperey@perey.com
- Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, public-xg-socialweb@w3.org, Chris Saad <chris.saad@gmail.com>
On 15 Jan 2010, at 12:27, Christine Perey wrote: > Hi Danny, > > Please also refer to/forward the Social Web Frameworks document: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/SocialWebFrameworks I think this document which does look very good, needs to get more of the Internet Of Subjects in it as described by their manifesto http://www.miscforum.eu/misc2010/conference/the-internet-of-subjects-manifesto.html (I think they are overblowing it a bit, especially the piece that claims that the current architecture is invalid http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/misc_2010_and_the_internet but I like the emphasis) [[ The new approach we propose allows the user to associate their Digital or Social Identity directly to Web 2.0 service providers. For example, your Friends Profile can be exposed to MySpace and Twitter, whereas your Work Profile to Plaxo and LinkedIn. Additionally, traditional service providers can utilise the same features, and your Health Profile can be exposed to Medicare and your Citizen Profile exposed to online Government services. ]] So the current text is using well known providers which is ok, but I think perhaps there is a bit of a danger of this document sounding like an advertising sheet for currently successful companies, which might have the effect of being off putting to other companies that don't find their name on there. The icons are prehaps too reminscent of current players. Also it does not take into account that I may wish to provide all these services myself. And that I think is a key part of the Social Web. More later, as I read through this document.... Henry > Thanks, > > -- > Christine > > Spime Wrangler > > cperey@perey.com > mobile +41 79 436 68 69 > VoIP (from US) +1 (617) 848-8159 > Skype (from anywhere) Christine_Perey > > > Danny Ayers wrote: >> [forwarding to Chris Saad, there seems a big overlap with >> DataPortability in these principles, I'd like to hear his take] >> 2010/1/14 "Döhler, Anita, VF-Group" <Anita.Doehler@vodafone.com>: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> We think a definition of high level principles which constitute the Social Web would be useful in the context of defining the framework for the Social Web and its concepts. >>> >>> Attached/below a proposal of so far 5 principles for dicsussion on the mailing list and/or at the next SWxG telcon. >>> >>> High level principles >>> >>> 1. What you see depends on who you are. >>> >>> 2. Once defined, you can use your connections and relationships, across different Social Networks or Social Applications. >>> >>> 3. You can expose your content (User Generated Content) to different Social Networks or Social Applications, without the need to store the content in these networks/applications. >>> >>> 4. You can define the access control on a per item basis, either per contact, or per group. >>> >>> 5. You can communicate with connections no matter which Social Network or Social Application you share. >>> >>> >>> Looking forward to hearing your comments w/r the need of agreeing on high level principles & their concrete content/wording, >>> >>> Regards >>> Dan (A) & Anita >>> >>> >
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 13:42:51 UTC