- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:54:51 -0600
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- CC: public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/30/09 5:02 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote: > On 9/29/09 7:56 AM, Harry Halpin wrote: > > <snip/> > > Thanks, Harry, I'm looking forward to it! This will be more of a > discussion than a formal talk, since I don't know what topics are of > interest to the team. > > Two points of clarification... > >>>> security (see Off-the-Record [3]) > The XMPP community is *not* actively exploring the use of OTR as our > solution for end-to-end encryption, instead we are actively defining an > application-level profile of Transport Layer Security, which is already > supported on a per-hop basis in all XMPP clients and servers. More here: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xmpp-e2e-requirements-00 > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-meyer-xmpp-e2e-encryption-02 > >> Looks good. I'd be interested to hear about the current state of >> incorporating X.509 into XMPP, and client support, if you have time to >> cover it ... I think we discussed that in the meeting, but feel free to ping me with further questions. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrDjVsACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyiKACgkTBMi0pm01J5Sni3jKhSMOPL 6ogAniV3oOF5UDKyKXtKPQPDc10tpD20 =GhIT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:55:26 UTC