- From: Ronald P. Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 11:35:06 -0400
- To: public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
It is only through questions we reveal how little we actually know about something but here goes: If I am making an assertion about some attribute of myself, can I ever hope to stay in "control" of the information without an inherent "time to life" for the information assertion? I am wondering if "time to life" is a necessary primitive. For example, my name and gender are unlikely to change (ever), my address might change on occasion, and my preferences can change with the wind. Clearly, someone can change or alter that "time to life" but in effect they are telling lies about me. If information about me comes only from me, I can inherently be the source for information about me, AND I can make those assertions categorically (they are known absolutely) for the "time to life". Comments please. -- ---------------- Ronald P. Reck Direct Line (360) 488-1082
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 15:37:45 UTC