- From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 06:33:26 -0400
- To: public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
Hi, Interesting for two reasons: * an issue with the expectations between the action and the results. * "Light Blue Touchpaper" has tested through sites the action. It means that each social pattern mechanism (of our deliverables) could be tested. An implementation report could be produced. It is a lot more work and we do not have the resources for now. On Thu, 21 May 2009 10:25:26 GMT In Are You Sure Those Photos Have Really Been Deleted? At http://mashable.com/2009/05/21/photos-deleted-facebook/ When you delete a photo from a site such as Facebook (Facebook reviews), Bebo or MySpace (MySpace reviews), is it really deleted immediately, or even at all? According to some interesting research conducted by Light Blue Touchpaper, many sites do not remove photos even 30 days after the user has deleted them. The study was conducted on 16 sites over the period of 30 days, and the results were awful. The details of the test, as described by LBT, are as follows: “For our experiment, we uploaded a test image onto 16 chosen sites with default permissions, then noted the URL of the uploaded image. Every site served the test image given knowledge of its URL except for Windows Lives Spaces, whose photo servers required session cookies (a refreshing congratulations to Microsoft for beating the competition in security). We ran our initial study for 30 days, and posted the results below. A dismal 7 of the 16 sites failed to revoke photos after 30 days“ The sites that failed the test include most of the biggest social networks out there: Facebook, MySpace, Bebo, and hi5 flat out failed the test, meaning the deleted photos were still available at the same URL. On other sites, such as Blogger (blogger reviews) and Friendster (Friendster reviews), the removal of the photos in question took some time, but it was ultimately carried out within the 30 day limit. Only four sites - Flickr (Flickr reviews), Photobucket (Photobucket reviews), Orkut and Windows Live Spaces (which used session cookies) - passed the test with flying colors. This means that most of these services don’t really put user privacy in the first place, as it’s technically easier to simply wait till the photos drop from server’s cache. And yes, it’s all there (usually) in the TOSes, but when you’re faced with the cold fact of your deleted photos not being removed even after 30 days, then “reasonable period of time” doesn’t really sound that reasonable anymore. -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://twitter.com/karlpro
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 10:33:39 UTC