- From: Ronald P. Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:52:56 -0400
- To: Socialweb XG Public <public-xg-socialweb@w3.org>
I have been thinking about the use cases and how one might exert any control over situations where information is moved from its original context and put into a new one. 1. what bearing does the old context have on the new one. For instance, if I provided some information about myself on twitter, if this same information is then placed on Facebook, how does the fact that it originated on twitter really matter? To me, it seems that information I provide would be broken down into assertions (maybe its just the RDF in me). These assertions would have accompanying metadata. It would be up to the rules or stipulations of the new context how that metadata was brought to bare. I conceive of people as instantiating a role when they provide information. So another way of asking the previous question is how does the role I am instantiating have a bearing on the new role? In secure networks, information can go from a lesser secure environment to a more secure environment, but going from a more secure environment to a less secure environment is difficult. If one were to extend this to our situation one might postulate that information can go from a less restricted situation to a more restricted situation easier than the converse. I think the rules of information promiscuity in the new context need interpretation in terms of the previous information promiscuity rules. Maybe something like, only provide this information to people I explicitly allow, or provide this information to others unless I explicitly denied them access. Does anyone else agree or disagree? -- ---------------- Ronald P. Reck Direct Line (360) 488-1082
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 16:53:38 UTC