- From: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:50:00 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Cc: Sören Preibusch <Soren.Preibusch@cl.cam.ac.uk>, Alex Korth <ak@ttbc.de>, public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
On 15 Jun 2009, at 12:28, Karl Dubost wrote: > (1): Full privacy doesn't exist. There is always someone in the > room, the provider of the service, except if communications are > crypted. I very rarely use the term privacy but I talk about opacity. That need not be the case. With foaf+ssl [1] it would be completely feasible for you to place all your information and your family's on a server that you controlled physically, and yet still participate in a social network in a way very similar to what is now possible with FaceBook, LinkedIn, Flickr, etc... except of course that the networks would be distributed. Henry [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/foaf+ssl
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 12:50:51 UTC