- From: Ezzat, Ahmed <Ahmed.Ezzat@hp.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 01:48:39 +0000
- To: "public-xg-rdb2rdf@w3.org" <public-xg-rdb2rdf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3B7AE9BA67C72B4891EF21842246A21C4049841E96@GVW1097EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Hello, Below are some comments on the Deliverable document... 1. Tool and Approach review: AKE> I will give input in a follow up email regarding the survey; I think the survey focused only on rdbms-data to RDF. If there is intention on publishing in SIGMOD, then it would be a good idea to cover all aspects of mapping between RDBMS and semantic web; this should include survey to mapping SPARQL to SQL. 2. Methodology for Transforming Relational Data into RDF: AKE> I am not clear of what is the conclusion on Jenny Green comment vs. original text. We need to be clear on distinguishing data from "schema & Ontology"? We have not talked, if my memory did not fail me, about mapping OWL ontology to SQL queries - comments? 3. Translating SPARQL to SQL: AKE> It might be good idea to elaborate more on the alternative approaches in the survey, and may be to have a proof of concept as deliverable in the WG later on. 4. RDF Representation of RDB Schema: AKE> Are we talking about automating the local ontology generation, i.e., either rdfs:Class or owl:Class mapping to SQL table and column as property or predicate ... or we mean something more? It might be good idea to have this as a header in the mapping survey document. Regards, Ahmed Ahmed K. Ezzat, Ph.D. HP Fellow, Business Intelligence Software Division Hewlett-Packard Corporation 11000 Wolf Road, Bldg 42 Upper, MS 4502, Cupertino, CA 95014-0691 Office: Email: Ahmed.Ezzat@hp.com<mailto:Ahmed.Ezzat@hp.com> Tel: 408-447-6380 Fax: 1408796-5427 Cell: 408-504-2603 Personal: Email: AhmedEzzat@aol.com<mailto:AhmedEzzat@aol.com> Tel: 408-253-5062 Fax: 408-253-6271
Received on Saturday, 3 January 2009 01:50:01 UTC