- From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:39:19 +0200
- To: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@apache.org>
- CC: public-xg-prov@w3.org
Hi Reto, If you take a look at the discussion of justifications for decisions in the Content section of the User Requirements document (http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/User_Requirements#Content). There's a notion of using provenance to justify why a system presents a particular outcome, in your case Why something is both a cat and a flying object. Also, in the News Aggregator Scenario, there's a notion of a seal (similar to the "oh yeah button") where users can find out why a post was constructed in a particular fashion. I hope that clarifies things. Paul Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote: > Hello > > I was just having a first read of the use cases and requirements. Most > use cases seem to assume single provenances of assertion and I was > wondering where a "oh yeah?"-button would fit in. > > Something Alices presses on when she reads [ rdf:type eg:cat; rdf:type > eg:flyingObject] to get an enumeration of sets of (sub)graphs and > their (somehow trusted) source that entail that there is something > that flies and is a cat. > > Cheers, > reto > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 14:56:54 UTC