- From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:47:47 +0000
- To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- CC: Yolanda Gil <gil@ISI.EDU>, "<public-xg-prov@w3.org>" <public-xg-prov@w3.org>
Hi James and All, This sounds like a good idea. I will try and prepare my use case by the end of this week. I'll be taking the blogging use case. Is anyone interested in writing a flag ship use case for the compliance with business contracts use case? Thanks, Paul James Cheney wrote: > OK. How about if I take a shot at this and others (such as Jim) can > feel free to jump in or offer alternatives if I'm doing it wrong? > > Jim, one thing I like a lot about the public policy example is that > there are fairly clear guidelines already about what should happen in > the classical (non-'e') setting, which grounds and constrains what a > solution must do to be useful in the field. Is there something > analogous in the bioinformatics settings you're familiar with (or is > this something whose absence we could highlight in the use case?) > > --James > > > On Feb 19, 2010, at 6:49 PM, Jim McCusker wrote: > >> >From a personal interest, I would vote for bioinformatics. I have >> been pushing adoption of a generalized provenance model for >> interchange in NCI's caBIG, and the use case below is core to >> research in that domain. >> >> Jim > > > On Feb 19, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Paul Groth wrote: > >> Hi James, >> >> So it involves essentially trying to make a larger use case that >> includes some aspects from other use cases so that it encompasses >> some more user requirements. I think it would be good to focus on a >> specific domain. We're trying to use this for explanation in the >> requirements report. >> >> You don't need to volunteer if you don't have the bandwidth. I just >> think it's best if the person who takes on the the use case uses it >> in the domain they want. >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> >> James Cheney wrote: >>> On Feb 19, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >>> >>>> Hi James and All, >>>> >>>> It seems that we have agreement on a use case e.g. a scientist uses >>>> linked data, processes it with a scientific workflow + some manual >>>> and qualitative analysis makes it available. >>>> >>>> The question seems which domain: eGovernment Public Policy or >>>> bioinformatics. There are benefits to both. >>>> >>>> * eGovernment has the whole push with Data.gov.uk and open >>>> government data, which has been really a hit with the community as >>>> a whole. Non-scientists can also usually understand policy type use >>>> cases. >>>> >>>> * for bioinformatics it would cement our ties with the HCLS working >>>> group. I know there are strong demands for provenance and several >>>> iniatives their trying to capture provenance type information. Also >>>> workflows and linked data have fairly strong user communities in >>>> the domain. >>>> >>>> I think the best way to solve this is who takes initiative :-) >>>> >>>> So is there anyone who would like to write up this use case (use >>>> case #2)? >>> >>> What is involved? I suppose that by speaking up I've volunteered, >>> but that's all right. >>> >>> I'm somewhat familiar with both domains (there are several >>> bioinformatics database curators in Edinburgh we've interacted >>> with). I can imagine that further in the future, the already blurry >>> line between public policy studies and eHealth might be even blurrier. >>> >>> Is there a reason not to do both? either >>> - add an eHealth/bioinformatics use case focusing on linked data >>> - or describing the eGov & eHealth aspects as instances of a generic >>> scenario ? Or would that make it too unfocused? >>> >>> --James
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 22:48:19 UTC