Re: Overview article/deliverable?

Dear Raphael,

I don't see many of your points really,  why would a W3C document 
necessarely need to be published before a scientifically reviewed one? 
e.g. wouldnt feedback help in any case?
The article idea was obviously like "toward etc.. " in no way stating 
the results  were final result, left alone official, left alone mine.
There was a great out of the ML support for the idea, but without the 
coordinator approval case closed for this deadline.
 From my side,  i'll be happy to make my overview material available 
(ppt) by the end of the month.

Giovanni


Raphaël Troncy wrote:
> Dear Giovanni,
>
> Congratulations on your new affiliation.
>
> I do NOT think what you plan is a good idea.
> First, I doubt you will make a journal paper within the next 2 weeks, and you will
> not get any deadline extensions.
> Second, and more important, the use cases are now in a state where they all need a
> major revision based on our discussion. The wrapping up, summarization and
> abstraction of the problems encountered should be made inside a deliverable that
> needs to be published before any research paper ! Once this deliverable will be
> published by W3C, their authors could decide if they want to make a conference or
> a journal paper with it, and call for more volunteers outside of the XG.
>
> Best regards.
>
>     Raphaël
>
> --
> Raphaël Troncy
> CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
> Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
> Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
> Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 15:10:32 UTC