- From: George Anadiotis <George.Anadiotis@cwi.nl>
- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 15:31:03 +0100 (CET)
- To: "Thomas Franz" <franz@uni-koblenz.de>
- Cc: "Jeff Z. Pan" <jpan@csd.abdn.ac.uk>, public-xg-mmsem@w3.org
Hello all Thomas, thanks for your reply, i fully agree with your comments. Hope you have a productive f2f, unfortunately i will not be able to join you. Best regards George > Dear Jeff, > > see my comments below ... > > George, do you agree? > > Jeff Z. Pan wrote: >> >> Dear George, Thomas and Susanne, >> >> Here are two quick questions on the tagging use case: >> >> 1) This is a very exciting use case. Am I right in saying that the >> interoperability here is among different tagging systems, rather than >> that of existing multimedia standards? Or there are some implicit >> relations between the two? > Yes, I agree. Tagging is used for the organization and retrieval of > multimedia > data, ranging from video, image, to text (e.g. youtube-like portals, > flickr, and blog sites). > Right now, there does not even exist any standard that specifies how to > model taggings > leading me to the second question. >> >> 2) I am not an expert of SKOS and could not quite see how SKOS can help. >> Could you give an example or clarify this point? > SKOS can be used to add semantics to the concepts that tags might > represent by providing > semantic links to other concepts. In general, SKOS can be used to > represent tags so that > taggings maintained on different platforms can be shared based on such a > common conceptual model. >> >> Best regards, >> Jeff >> >
Received on Sunday, 3 December 2006 14:31:25 UTC