Thursday, 29 September 2011
- Passing the baton - of the draft
- Re: LLD XG editorial telecon - report
- LLD XG editorial telecon - report
- Fwd: [IFLA-L] EUscreen's television archives join Linked Open Data movement
- Re: What documents stay on the wiki?
Wednesday, 28 September 2011
- What documents stay on the wiki?
- Re: LLD XG Editorial telecon - Thursday, 10am EST
- Re: LLD XG Editorial telecon - Thursday, 10am EST
- Re: LLD XG Editorial telecon - Thursday, 10am EST
- Re: LLD XG Editorial telecon - Thursday, 10am EST
- LLD XG Editorial telecon - Thursday, 10am EST
Thursday, 22 September 2011
Wednesday, 21 September 2011
- Re: Swedish National Bibliography and authority data released with open license
- Re: Swedish National Bibliography and authority data released with open license
- Swedish National Bibliography and authority data released with open license
Tuesday, 20 September 2011
Monday, 19 September 2011
- Re: comma style?
- Re: comma style?
- Re: questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.
- Re: questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.
Sunday, 18 September 2011
Saturday, 17 September 2011
Friday, 16 September 2011
- Re: comma style?
- Re: Links to "use cases" from "available data"
- Re: comma style?
- Re: comma style?
- Re: comma style?
- Re: questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.
- Re: Links to "use cases" from "available data"
- Re: Use case acks
- Re: Expansion of acronym "RDFa"
- Re: Use case acks
- Re: Use case acks
Thursday, 15 September 2011
- Re: Links to "use cases" from "available data"
- Use case acks
- Re: Links to "use cases" from "available data"
- Links to "use cases" from "available data"
- Re: comma style?
- Re: Vocabulary and Dataset deliverable
- Re: questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.
- Expansion of acronym "RDFa"
- Re: questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.
- Re: Vocabulary and Dataset deliverable
- Re: questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.
- Re: questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.
- Re: questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.
- Re: questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.
- Re: Vocabulary and Dataset deliverable
- Re: comma style?
- Re: questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.
- Re: comma style?
- Re: Related blog post: "We just released the MMA version of MARC21 elements and vocabularies in RDF"
- questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.
- Vocabulary and Dataset deliverable
- Re: Changes to "Benefits" page
- Re: Changes to "Benefits" page
- comma style?
- editing the Vocabulary and Dataset deliverable (NOW)
- Re: Changes to "Benefits" page
- Re: Related blog post: "We just released the MMA version of MARC21 elements and vocabularies in RDF"
Wednesday, 14 September 2011
- Re: Changes to "Relevant Technologies" appendix
- Re: Related blog post: "We just released the MMA version of MARC21 elements and vocabularies in RDF"
- Re: Changes to "Relevant Technologies" appendix
- Changes to "Relevant Technologies" appendix
- Re: More questions acronyms
- Changes to "Benefits" page
- Re: More questions acronyms
- Re: Appendix A done
- More questions acronyms
- Re: Editing "Available data" side deliverable
- Re: Appendix A done
- Re: Editing "Available data" side deliverable
- LLD XG Editorial telecon - Thursday, 10am EST
- Re: Reference to "the" Resource Description Framework?
- Re: Reference to "the" Resource Description Framework?
- Editing Use Case report
- Re: Reference to "the" Resource Description Framework?
- Reference to "the" Resource Description Framework?
Tuesday, 13 September 2011
- Re: Editing "Available data" side deliverable
- Appendix A done
- Re: Editing "Available data" side deliverable
- Re: IRIs - proposed resolution - going once...
- Re: Related blog post: "We just released the MMA version of MARC21 elements and vocabularies in RDF"
- Re: Executive Summary--italics to stress who each recommendation is directed at?
- Re: IRIs - proposed resolution - going once...
- Re: IRIs - proposed resolution - going once...
- Fwd: Related blog post: "We just released the MMA version of MARC21 elements and vocabularies in RDF"
- Re: LLD cloud (with a specific attn to William!)
Monday, 12 September 2011
- Re: Visualizing metadata element sets in side deliverable
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Editing "Available data" side deliverable
- Re: Visualizing metadata element sets in side deliverable
- Re: puzzled by this note: "URLs: wikipedia, dbpedia"
- Re: Visualizing metadata element sets in side deliverable
- Re: capitalized "Linked Data"
Sunday, 11 September 2011
- Re: LLD cloud (with a specific attn to William!)
- Re: Visualizing metadata element sets in side deliverable
- Re: LLD cloud (with a specific attn to William!)
- Re: Visualizing metadata element sets in side deliverable
- Re: capitalized "Linked Data"
- Re: Editing Use Case report
- Re: Editing Use Case report
- Re: Editing Use Case report
- Editing Use Case report
- Re: "library Linked Data" (capitalization)
- Re: capitalized "Linked Data"
- RE: IRIs - proposed resolution
- Re: IRIs - proposed resolution
- Re: IRIs - proposed resolution
- RE: IRIs - proposed resolution
- RE: IRIs - proposed resolution
- RE: IRIs - proposed resolution
- RE: IRIs - proposed resolution
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
Saturday, 10 September 2011
- RE: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: IRIs - proposed resolution
- Re: IRIs - proposed resolution
- Re: IRIs - proposed resolution
- IRIs - proposed resolution
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA)
- Re: definitions of element sets and value vocabularies--Scope vs. Appendix A?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA)
- Re: Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA)
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA)
- Re: Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA)
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: Scope -- "library Linked Data" or "Library Linked Data"?
- Re: lowercased 'websites'
- Re: capitalized "Linked Data"
- Re: Recommendations: "Apply library experience" - Antoine?
- Re: Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA)
- Re: Appendix A: stressing the definitions
- Re: "library Linked Data" (capitalization)
- Re: Scope -- "library Linked Data" or "Library Linked Data"?
- Re: capitalized "Linked Data"
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: definitions of element sets and value vocabularies--Scope vs. Appendix A?
- Re: Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA)
- Re: puzzled by this note: "URLs: wikipedia, dbpedia"
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: OCLC acronym - Jeff?
- Re: "particular uniquely identified resource"
- OCLC acronym - Jeff?
Friday, 9 September 2011
- RE: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- RE: puzzled by this note: "URLs: wikipedia, dbpedia"
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- RE: puzzled by this note: "URLs: wikipedia, dbpedia"
- RE: puzzled by this note: "URLs: wikipedia, dbpedia"
- RE: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- puzzled by this note: "URLs: wikipedia, dbpedia"
- Re: "particular uniquely identified resource"
- Re: internal links to the Appendices?
- Appendix A: stressing the definitions
- definitions of element sets and value vocabularies--Scope vs. Appendix A?
- Executive Summary--italics to stress who each recommendation is directed at?
- Re: Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA)
- Re: capitalization question: Should "Patrons" and "Organizations" be lowercased?
- Re: capitalization question: Should "Patrons" and "Organizations" be lowercased?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: order of acronyms?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA)
- Re: infrastructure costs (rather than infrastructural costs)
- Re: infrastructure costs (rather than infrastructural costs)
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: "particular uniquely identified resource"
- Re: internal links to the Appendices?
- Re: order of acronyms?
- "library Linked Data" (capitalization)
- a few minor changes
- Re: infrastructure costs (rather than infrastructural costs)
- Re: "particular uniquely identified resource"
- Re: internal links to the Appendices?
- Re: order of acronyms?
- Re: capitalization question: Should "Patrons" and "Organizations" be lowercased?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA)
- Re: Scope -- "library Linked Data" or "Library Linked Data"?
- infrastructure costs (rather than infrastructural costs)
- RE: Scope -- "library Linked Data" or "Library Linked Data"?
- "particular uniquely identified resource"
- Scope -- "library Linked Data" or "Library Linked Data"?
- internal links to the Appendices?
- lowercased 'websites'
- order of acronyms?
- added "Web pages" to our style guide
- capitalization question: Should "Patrons" and "Organizations" be lowercased?
- RE: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- capitalized "Linked Data"
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: Recommendations: "Apply library experience" - Antoine?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: LLD cloud (with a specific attn to William!)
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: Updated publication plan
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
Thursday, 8 September 2011
- Re: Recommendations: "Apply library experience" - Antoine?
- LLD cloud (with a specific attn to William!)
- Re: Recommendations: "Apply library experience" - Antoine?
- Re: Recommendations: "Apply library experience" - Antoine?
- Updated publication plan
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Recommendations: "Apply library experience" - Antoine?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: Acronym expansion in Abstract
- Acronym expansion in Abstract
- LLD XG Editors' meeting - minutes
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- changes to authority displays Re: Editing "Issues"
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: Editing "Issues"
- Re: Terminology : libraries, library world, library community
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
Wednesday, 7 September 2011
- Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: Abstract (Executive Summary)
- Re: Status (Executive Summary)
- Re: Abstract (Executive Summary)
- Re: Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec
- Re: Terminology : libraries, library world, library community
- LLD XG Editorial telecon - Thursday, 10am EST
- I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?
- Re: Terminology : libraries, library world, library community
- Re: Terminology : libraries, library world, library community
- Re: Editing "Issues"
- Re: Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec
- Re: Terminology : libraries, library world, library community
- Re: Editing "Issues"
- Re: Editing "Issues"
- Re: Editing "Issues"
- Re: Terminology : libraries, library world, library community
- Re: Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec
- Re: Editing "Issues"
- Re: Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec
- Re: Editing "Issues"
- Terminology : libraries, library world, library community
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec
- Re: Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- AW: Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: Checking "Apply library experience in curation" rec
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: Checking "Apply library experience in curation" rec
- Re: Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec
- Re: Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
Tuesday, 6 September 2011
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: Checking "Apply library experience in curation" rec
- Re: Checking "Apply library experience in curation" rec
- Use cases report "completed"
- Re: Checking "Apply library experience in curation" rec
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec - 2
- Re: Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec
- Re: Checking "Apply library experience in curation" rec
- Re: Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec
- Re: Checking "Apply library experience in curation" rec
- Re: "Publish the policies followed when coining URIs"
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Checking "Increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization" rec
- Checking "Apply library experience in curation" rec
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: "Publish the policies followed when coining URIs"
- Re: "Foster a discussion about Open Data and rights"
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- AW: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- AW: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: "Publish the policies followed when coining URIs"
- Re: Editing recommendations - c'ed
- Re: "Foster a discussion about Open Data and rights"
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Editing "Issues"
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: "Connect library data standards to the linked data space"
- Re: "Microformats, Microdata, and RDFa" - attn: Jeff and Peter!
- Re: Editing Scope of this report
- Re: "Connect library data standards to the linked data space"
- Re: Recommendations -- authority files and discrete values
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Guide of construction of ontologies (was: Re: "Namespace" = "vocabulary with URIs"?)
- Re: "Publish the policies followed when coining URIs"
- Re: "Connect library data standards to the linked data space"
- Editing recommendations - c'ed
- Re: Editing "Issues"
- Re: Recommendations -- authority files and discrete values
- Re: Recommendations -- authority files and discrete values
- Re: Recommendations -- authority files and discrete values
- Re: Recommendations -- authority files and discrete values
- Re: Recommendations -- authority files and discrete values
- Re: Recommendations -- authority files and discrete values
- Re: Recommendations -- authority files and discrete values
Monday, 5 September 2011
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: "Foster a discussion about Open Data and rights"
- Recommendations -- authority files and discrete values
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Editing "Issues"
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Editing "Issues"
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: "Microformats, Microdata, and RDFa" - attn: Jeff and Peter!
- Re: Editing Scope of this report
- Abstract (Executive Summary)
- Re: Another appendix A question
- Re: Editing Scope of this report
- Re: Another appendix A question - "side deliverable"
- Re: Fwd: Library Linked Data page UseCaseReport has been changed by Karen Coyle
- Re: Editing Scope of this report
- Re: Fwd: Library Linked Data page UseCaseReport has been changed by Karen Coyle
- Re: Questions on Appendix A
- Re: "Microformats, Microdata, and RDFa" - attn: Jeff and Peter!
- Re: Editing Scope of this report
- Re: Questions on Appendix A
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- "Namespace" = "vocabulary with URIs"?
- Fwd: Library Linked Data page UseCaseReport has been changed by Karen Coyle
- Re: "Connect library data standards to the linked data space"
- Re: Another appendix A question - "side deliverable"
- Re: "Connect library data standards to the linked data space"
- Re: "Microformats, Microdata, and RDFa" - attn: Jeff and Peter!
- Re: Questions on Appendix A
- Re: Editing Scope of this report
- Preservation (was Re: "Publish the policies followed when coining URIs")
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: "Publish the policies followed when coining URIs"
- Re: Another appendix A question - "side deliverable"
- Re: Another appendix A question - "side deliverable"
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Another appendix A question
- Re: Pubby "automates URIs"? - attn: Peter, Jeff
- Re: "Publish the policies followed when coining URIs"
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Editing Scope of this report
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- RE: Pubby "automates URIs"? - attn: Peter, Jeff
- Re: Editing Scope of this report
- Re: AcknowledgementsMainDeliverable folded into report header
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Editing Scope of this report
- Re: Questions on Appendix A
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: "Publish the policies followed when coining URIs"
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: AcknowledgementsMainDeliverable folded into report header
- Re: "Foster a discussion about Open Data and rights"
- Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: Pubby "automates URIs"? - attn: Peter, Jeff
- Re: "Microformats, Microdata, and RDFa" - attn: Jeff and Peter!
- Questions on Appendix A
- RE: Pubby "automates URIs"? - attn: Peter, Jeff
- Re: Pubby "automates URIs"? - attn: Peter, Jeff
Sunday, 4 September 2011
- Pubby "automates URIs"? - attn: Peter, Jeff
- RE: "Microformats, Microdata, and RDFa" - attn: Jeff and Peter!
- "Microformats, Microdata, and RDFa" - attn: Jeff and Peter!
- Re: "Publish the policies followed when coining URIs"
- Re: "Connect library data standards to the linked data space"
- "re-use"
- Re: "Connect library data standards to the linked data space"
- Referencing RFC 3305 and httpRange-14 in "Relevant Technologies"
- AcknowledgementsMainDeliverable folded into report header
- Re: "Foster a discussion about Open Data and rights"
- Re: ILSes
- Re: "Connect library data standards to the linked data space"
- Re: "Foster a discussion about Open Data and rights"
- "Publish the policies followed when coining URIs"
- "Connect library data standards to the linked data space"
- "Create URIs for the items in library datasets"
- "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
- Re: "Foster a discussion about Open Data and rights"
- "Develop library data standards..."
- Re: "Foster a discussion about Open Data and rights"
- "Foster a discussion about Open Data and rights"
- Re: HTML generation and hyperlinks
- Re: "Library Linked Data available today"
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
Saturday, 3 September 2011
- Re: ILSes
- W3C website down?
- Re: HTML generation and hyperlinks
- "Rights ownership is complex"
- Re: The acronym "RDA" in the name of JSC
- "Library Linked Data available today"
- Re: HTML generation and hyperlinks
- Re: ILSes
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- ILSes
- Re: Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Library data is expressed primarily as text strings
- Re: The acronym "RDA" in the name of JSC
- Re: Copy-editing Benefits - attn: Emma
- Re: Expanding library-world acronyms and spelling "cataloging" without "u"
- Re: The acronym "RDA" in the name of JSC
- Re: The acronym "RDA" in the name of JSC
Friday, 2 September 2011
- Re: HTML generation and hyperlinks
- Re: The acronym "RDA" in the name of JSC
- Re: Copy-editing Benefits - attn: Emma
- Re: The acronym "RDA" in the name of JSC
- The acronym "RDA" in the name of JSC
- Re: Copy-editing Benefits
- Re: HTML generation and hyperlinks
- Re: Copy-editing Benefits
- Re: Expanding library-world acronyms and spelling "cataloging" without "u"
- Re: Expanding library-world acronyms and spelling "cataloging" without "u"
- Re: Copy-editing Benefits
- HTML generation and hyperlinks
- Re: Expanding library-world acronyms and spelling "cataloging" without "u"
- Expanding library-world acronyms and spelling "cataloging" without "u"
- Re: First mention of RDF - IMPORTANT ISSUE
- Re: Removed transclusion in The Current Situation
- provenance questionnaire -- to inform W3C provenance ontology
Thursday, 1 September 2011
- Removed transclusion in The Current Situation
- Copy-editing Benefits
- Re: Copy edits on "Scope"
- Re: Details in ConversionStyle
- Re: Copy edits on "Scope"
- Re: Details in ConversionStyle
- Re: First mention of RDF - IMPORTANT ISSUE
- RE: First mention of RDF - IMPORTANT ISSUE
- Details in ConversionStyle
- First mention of RDF - IMPORTANT ISSUE
- Re: Fwd: draft press release
- Re: Fwd: draft press release
- Copy edits on "Scope"
- Re: Fwd: draft press release
- Status of publication tasks after today's telecon
- Re: Fwd: draft press release
- Fwd: draft press release