- From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 13:48:46 -0400
- To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
On tomorrow's call, besides the usual updates on the status of each section of the draft report, I would like to ask for one volunteer to do a LIGHTWEIGHT REVIEW. A reviewer should carefully read through the section in question and be prepared to discuss the following on the 26 May call: -- Overall, how complete and polished does the section or deliverable look? Details aside, how close does it seem to a final form? -- Do any points leap out as being particularly problematic (needing further discussion) or potentially controversial? Are any big issues missing completely? The sections of the report to be reviewed are: "Library Linked Data": scope of this report -- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReport#Scope_of_.22Library_Linked_Data.22 Benefits -- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Benefits Available vocabularies and datasets -- will summarize http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset Relevant technologies -- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_Relevant_Technologies Implementation challenges and barriers to adoption -- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_issues_page Recommendations and next steps -- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_recommendations_page Plus the two separate deliverables: Use Case Report -- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport LLD Vocabularies and Datasets -- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset Tom -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 17:49:17 UTC