- From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 13:48:46 -0400
- To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
On tomorrow's call, besides the usual updates on the status of each section
of the draft report, I would like to ask for one volunteer to do a
LIGHTWEIGHT REVIEW.
A reviewer should carefully read through the section in question and
be prepared to discuss the following on the 26 May call:
-- Overall, how complete and polished does the section or deliverable look?
Details aside, how close does it seem to a final form?
-- Do any points leap out as being particularly problematic (needing further
discussion) or potentially controversial? Are any big issues missing
completely?
The sections of the report to be reviewed are:
"Library Linked Data": scope of this report
-- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReport#Scope_of_.22Library_Linked_Data.22
Benefits
-- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Benefits
Available vocabularies and datasets
-- will summarize http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset
Relevant technologies
-- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_Relevant_Technologies
Implementation challenges and barriers to adoption
-- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_issues_page
Recommendations and next steps
-- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_recommendations_page
Plus the two separate deliverables:
Use Case Report
-- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport
LLD Vocabularies and Datasets
-- http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset
Tom
--
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 17:49:17 UTC