- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:45:15 -0800
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: "public-xg-lld@w3.org" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Quoting Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>: > > The suggestion was to re-frame it into producing a section on > "relevant technology" for the report--or a side deliverable if the > owners feel like reporting on many things. Would that make sense to > the action owners? Or a bit of both? We should probably mention relevant technology in the report, but a longer investigation could be a side report on the wiki. kc > > We were also thinking of asking Kevin and Kim to jump in, because > they do have quite some experience with tooling as well. > Ed would be an ideal victim, but he's already formally involved in > other sections ;-) > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/03/03-lld-minutes.html > > >> We talked this morning about what tools are available for LLD. I >> think Jeff volunteered to write something up. :-) I think this will >> make a difference for the issues section, so I'd like to encourage >> folks to contribute in this area if they know of LLD tools (or LD >> tools that can be applied to LLD). (Maybe we need a section or wiki >> page for this.) >> >> I'd also like for us to make clear what are developer tools and >> what are "user" tools (e.g. for catalogers or others who want to >> create data). I usually get asked about the latter because that's >> who is in my audience in most cases. However, both are useful (and >> there may be other categories -- these are the two that come to >> mind). >> >> kc >> > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 14:45:48 UTC