- From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:01:56 +0100
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- CC: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi Antoine, I agree. The executive summary as it will be written may already fulfill the role of reading guide, or at least a list of things to expect. The one writing the exec summary should keep that in mind, then we probably dont need a separate "reading guide". Mark On 28/01/2011 0:00, Antoine Isaac wrote: > Hi everyone, > > On the following action: > > ACTION: Antoine to include executive summary placeholder in report > [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/01/27-lld-minutes.html#action01] > > > I have added a placeholder at [1], trying to sum up what we discussed: > [ > "executive summary" of 1 or 2 pages for decision makers. Decision-makers > about library technology need a snapshot--which could be anyway also > useful for other persons, like implementers or would-be implementers of > any kind of library-related LOD project. > > Perhaps it could also function as a reading guide/entry point to other > sections. > ] > > Note the conditional in the last item. I think there is no contradiction > between having a piece of text that works as an executive summary and a > reading guide, on the contrary. Yet in the discussion prior to the > action we mentioned the two things, but did not make an explicit > statement about them being one and a same. I've just left "could" for > the time being, in case any of you has objections. > > Best, > > Antoine > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=DraftReport&oldid=2831#Executive_Summary > >
Received on Friday, 28 January 2011 09:02:46 UTC