- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:34:34 +0100
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- CC: "ZENG, MARCIA" <mzeng@kent.edu>, "public-xg-lld@w3.org" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>, "Panzer,Michael" <panzerm@oclc.org>
Hi Karen, Marcia, Michael (and everyone else!) I've tried to re-structure our 'Temporary Questions and Notes (from use cases)' re-using (and adapting) Karen's categories: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Cluster_VocAlign&oldid=2627#Problems_and_limitations The result is perhaps too detailed, as I want for now to keep the matter for the issues. But generally I found it a very useful exercise. Cheers, Antoine > Yes, Marcia, I think that your list of "temporary questions" is mostly what I am thinking of as a gap analysis. I would like to suggest that each cluster include a gap analysis derived from the use cases, and that in the end we should bring these together as part of our final report. > > kc > > Quoting "ZENG, MARCIA" <mzeng@kent.edu>: > >> Karen, >> We have a 'Temporary Questions and Notes (from use cases)' section temporarily sitting there in the VocAlign cluster wiki page. [1] I think there are similar types of gaps with what you have listed. Do you think those can be useful points? We have not summarized/organized them yet. >> Marcia >> >> [1] 8. Temporary Questions and Notes (from use cases) >> in: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Cluster_VocAlign >> >> >> >> On 1/6/11 1:57 PM, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: >> >> This is a (hasty?) gap analysis from the Archives Cluster: >> >> Missing Vocabularies >> - sometimes specific (physical state of original in a preservation >> context), sometimes general (need vocabularies for preservation data), >> but no vocabulary for the function or data elements >> >> Data incompatibilities or lacks >> - current data is free text, but contains quantitative information >> that needs to be pulled out >> - data needs to be qualified as "estimated" or "derived" so users know >> it is not precise (this is possibly a vocabulary issue) >> - current practice does not include rich relationships, just >> "related," so there is no source of relationships >> >> Community guidance >> - no examples in our community domain that we can follow >> - lack of information on how to create a data model >> - no community guidance on which technologies and vocabularies to use >> >> Technology questions >> - is linked data scalable to the size we need? >> - is linked data appropriate for highly hierarchical data models? >> >> Technology availability >> - no systems available on market for linked data creation and use >> - open source solutions available are in an unfinished state >> >> >> kc >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net >> ph: 1-510-540-7596 >> m: 1-510-435-8234 >> skype: kcoylenet >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:33:17 UTC