- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:57:14 -0800
- To: "public-xg-lld@w3.org" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
This is a (hasty?) gap analysis from the Archives Cluster: Missing Vocabularies - sometimes specific (physical state of original in a preservation context), sometimes general (need vocabularies for preservation data), but no vocabulary for the function or data elements Data incompatibilities or lacks - current data is free text, but contains quantitative information that needs to be pulled out - data needs to be qualified as "estimated" or "derived" so users know it is not precise (this is possibly a vocabulary issue) - current practice does not include rich relationships, just "related," so there is no source of relationships Community guidance - no examples in our community domain that we can follow - lack of information on how to create a data model - no community guidance on which technologies and vocabularies to use Technology questions - is linked data scalable to the size we need? - is linked data appropriate for highly hierarchical data models? Technology availability - no systems available on market for linked data creation and use - open source solutions available are in an unfinished state kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2011 19:00:57 UTC