- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:34:22 +0200
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- CC: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Bernard, Tom, Jodi, Thanks a lot for your feedback on this! > Good news is that I'm still alive and lurking at what is going on in LLD, if not more ... > "It depends what the arrow means.". Indeed! That's why with VOAF we have tried to explicit different meaning of arrows linking vocabularies. > See http://labs.mondeca.com/vocab/voaf/index.html#reliesOn and following properties. > > I would be happy to see this vocabulary reused/criticized/augmented here. In fact we want to make our own LLD version of the LOV cloud, which in principle should imply re-using the data you've assembled, checking it, completing it... or simplify it :-) We'll of course keep everyone posted, *if* we manage to find time for this. > See e.g. graphics at > http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_dcmitype.html > http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/details/vocabulary_event.html > To see different flavours of links. Actually arrows are often confusing so we decided to have a graph for in links and another for out links, and colors on the vocabularies referencing and referenced by the current vocabularies following the "meaning" of links. > > When a vocabulary has several different ways to be linked to the current one, it appears more that one. This is a bit suboptimal. > And of course with more than 100 vocabularies now, the most popular ones such as FOAF, DC or SKOS already meet a problem of scalability of the graph ... I have some hope that if we restrict it to the smaller sets of vocabularies used in our cases [1], it will remain manageable. Antoine [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#Metadata_element_sets_published_as_Semantic_Web_ontologies > > 2011/4/13 Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de <mailto:tbaker@tbaker.de>> > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:05:40PM +0100, Jodi Schneider wrote: > > From the perspective of giving an overview, I especially like the "cloud" mockup, where an arrow means that a vocabulary is being used in another. (I'd consider switching the direction of the arrows, but maybe that's just me!) > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/File:LLD-MetadataElementSetCloudMock.png > > I guess it depends what the arrow means. I read it as meaning "references", so > the direction of the arrows looks correct to me. > > Tom > > -- > Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de <mailto:tbaker@tbaker.de>> > > > > > -- > Bernard Vatant > Senior Consultant > Vocabulary & Data Integration > Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459 > Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> > ---------------------------------------------------- > Mondeca > 3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France > Web: http://www.mondeca.com > Blog: http://mondeca.wordpress.com > ----------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 09:32:48 UTC