- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:52:21 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi everyone, A belated reaction onthe sentence >What LLD can bring is clarification of when using application profiles and when using OWL found in the minutes of last call [1]. I find that expression a bit strange. Gordon puts it better at [2]: > here does not seem to be a consensus on when application profiles or ontologies should be used, or, indeed, whether there is any fundamental difference. To me OWL should be indeed a tool to specify APs, and not an alternative to APs. Jeff and Ross promised something on this for the (optional part of the) F2F meeting [3], that seems to me a very crucial idea to explore. I'm looking forwards to hear what they have to say, in fact :-) Cheers, Antoine [1]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/09/09-lld-minutes.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Library_standards_and_linked_data#Application_profiles_or_OWL_ontologies [3]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/JointMeeting2010#Part_2_.2816:00-17:30.29:_Emerging_models_and_new_uses_for_application_profiles
Received on Thursday, 16 September 2010 10:52:54 UTC