- From: Emmanuelle Bermes <emmanuelle.bermes@bnf.fr>
- Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 20:43:49 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTik2+JCjtWotnEN=99Y_2TK75suHeZF95LaPn1vw@mail.gmail.com>
I just added the following sentence to the use case mail text : "The information you provide will be curated and published on the group wikispace at [3]." The idea is to avoid having to cope with copyright issues... Do we have to be more specific there ? Emmanuelle On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Emmanuelle Bermes <emmanuelle.bermes@bnf.fr>wrote: > Is there a reason why we don't provide a link to [1] ? From there people > can get all the links to other references including TBL's Design issues > document. > > Emmanuelle > > [1] http://linkeddata.org/ > > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > >> Jeff, >> >> >> >> There are subtle but troubling differences between the two documents >>> that we've ignored so far. I don't think it's LLD XG's job to reconcile >>> them, but until this happens I think Linked Data will remain an enigma >>> to many people. >>> >> >> >> Yes, that's probably worth to have a closer look in the future. I hope >> you're keeping track of these--on the topics wiki page, maybe ;-) >> >> >> >> >>> I agree that Tim's document is the one to read first because it is light >>> and intuitive. If someone wants to actually create Linked Data, though, >>> they really should read the Cool URIs document. >>> >>> I would rather see one link rather than zero. Tim's design issues >>> document is fine. >>> >> >> >> We've got a deal! >> >> Thanks, >> >> Antoine >> >> > > > -- > ===== > Emmanuelle Bermès - http://www.bnf.fr > Manue - http://www.figoblog.org > -- ===== Emmanuelle Bermès - http://www.bnf.fr Manue - http://www.figoblog.org
Received on Sunday, 5 September 2010 18:44:23 UTC