W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Use case mail

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 10:10:14 +0200
Message-ID: <4C81FEE6.6000600@few.vu.nl>
To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
CC: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>

> There are subtle but troubling differences between the two documents
> that we've ignored so far. I don't think it's LLD XG's job to reconcile
> them, but until this happens I think Linked Data will remain an enigma
> to many people.

Yes, that's probably worth to have a closer look in the future. I hope you're keeping track of these--on the topics wiki page, maybe ;-)

> I agree that Tim's document is the one to read first because it is light
> and intuitive. If someone wants to actually create Linked Data, though,
> they really should read the Cool URIs document.
> I would rather see one link rather than zero. Tim's design issues
> document is fine.

We've got a deal!


Received on Saturday, 4 September 2010 08:10:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:38:36 UTC