Re: Short names

Tom, thanks, I did most of these. Can explain my decisions if you wish...

kc

Quoting Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>:

> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:43:03AM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
>> I have added short names to the topics page. I tried to use names that
>> are pronounceable and make sense, but of course that only means they
>> make sense to me. Shall we take a short time for review (sorry this is
>> so close to our meeting deadlines), in which others make or suggest
>> changes?
>
> Hi Karen,
>
> They generally look great!  A few suggestions below.
>
> Tom
>
> -- LLD.INVENTORY makes me think of "inventory data". Maybe:
>
>         LLD.AVAILABLE-DATA?
>
>    I don't think we should worry too much about making the
>    names super-short...
>
> -- "Populating reference data models when legacy data is not
>    perfectly fitting (see this thread on partial FRBR data)
>    [antoine] [LLD. REFERENCE-DATA]"
>
>         LLD.REFERENCEMODEL-FIT ?
>
> -- "Check if and how to use SKOS to describe integrated KOS
>    or mapping results. [marcia, keckert] [LLD. SKOS]"
>
>         LLD.SKOS-INTEGRATION ?
>
> -- "Dilemma between skos:concept and foaf:person (rda:person,
>    frbr:person, frad:person) for person authorities [jyoung4,
>    ahaffner, bvatant, ndelaforge, keckert, wwaites2, rsinger,
>    marma, emmanuelle, abartov] [LLD. PERSON]"
>
>         LLD.SKOS-FOAF-PERSON ?
>
> -- "The Linked Data paradigm and the Metadata Record
>    paradigm [GordonD, AMicsik, dlukose, emmanuelle, jphipps]
>    [SW. LD-V-RECORDS]"
>
>         SW.RECORDS-GRAPHS ?
>
> -- "Models for packaging Linked Data in records, e.g.,
>    Named Graphs [jyoung4, keckert, StuWeibel, emmanuelle]
>    [SW. LD-PACKAGING]"
>
>         SW.RECORDS-NAMED-GRAPHS ?
>
> --
> Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
>



-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 18:11:29 UTC