Re: Use case notes page

Hi Jodi,

Thanks. So you think that these items should definitely covered by more use cases? I was actually not sure that this was the case... Perhaps we have in fact already some cases for them, I just did not have the time to dive into what they were describing.

Cheers,

Antoine


> I added 4 items to the 'things that should be covered by use cases' from
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=UseCaseNotes&oldid=2128 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=UseCaseNotes&oldid=2128>
>
>     * *Link Social Bibliography to a Bibliographic Network*. Link reviews, tags, lists, cover art to a work. /This seems like a variation on the enrich a record use case./
>     * *Find stuff in several collections*.Searching a specific set of library and non-library collections--for instance to find a given book or DVD, or get access to an article. I'm thinking about this first as a local area search with a specific set of libraries--but then also as a 'travel' awareness search (for the harder-to-find things I'm willing to go out of my way to find, while travelling). I'd love, for instance, a mashup between TripIt/Dopplr, my calendar of availability, and my LibraryThing wishlist -- alerting me to possibilities to use items I can't get locally when I have a free day out-of-town. Jodi Schneider <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/User:Jschneid4> 13:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC) /It seems that we don't have any such far-stretching case. Or this item rather calling for enabling mesh-ups, not doing them? (Antoine)/
>     * *Find e-books* see http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2010/07/finding-ebooks.html
>     * archives and linked data, knitting together multiple identifiers <http://inkdroid.org/journal/2010/08/12/archival-context-on-the-web/>
>
>
> I can expand with more detail if it's helpful.
>
> -Jodi
>
> On 11 Nov 2010, at 10:38, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I've started some clean-up of http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseNotes
>> hoping that pretty soon we could just remove it from [1], as part of an attempt to have [2] as only one list of things that should motivate our searching for new cases.
>>
>> It's not yet dead, though. Feedback is welcome from these who created the non-deleted items: please declare them as dead of move them to [2]! We could discuss them in a next call whether we're interested enough to include them in the list we agreed upon at the F2F...
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>> [1]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCases#Related_topics.2C_are_these_covered_yet.3F
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh_Outcomes#Things_that_should_be_covered_by_use_cases
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 17:33:01 UTC