Re: test of transclusion

Hi,

I think I'd favor keeping this transclusion page following [4] and make the deliverable angle come into play a bit later.
Btw, [2] lacks the two(or three)-level hierarchy of [4]. Are we interested in keeping it?

Antoine


> I've started creating category pages for each topic [1] and
> reorganising [2] so that it's just a transclusion of these category
> pages.
> I'm not sure I'll have the time in the coming days to finish the work
> I've started, so anyone please feel free  to continue ;-)
>
> I have a question : how is this page related with [3] ? Currently, [2]
> is organised exactly like [4].
> I'm wondering if a "TopicsDiscussed" page shouldn't follow the new
> organisation of topics we defined during the F2F. Wouldn't it help us
> more with the first steps of the report ?
>
> Once the transclusion is completed, it will be fairly easy to
> reorganise [2] following [3], if that's what we want to do.
>
> Emmanuelle
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Category:LLDTopics
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/TopicsDiscussed
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh_Outcomes#Use_cases_.26_Topics_9:00-10:30_.2B_11:00-12:30
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Topics
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Antoine Isaac<aisaac@few.vu.nl>  wrote:
>>
>>> Transclusion does work on our wiki.
>>>
>>> Here's an example page.
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Transclusion_Test
>>> Click 'edit' to look at the source and see how it's done.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Excellent!
>> Thanks a lot, Jodi. I think this definitively sorts out how we should
>> organize the topic pages on the wiki.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 23:02:12 UTC