- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:02:01 +0100
- To: Manue <manue@figoblog.org>
- CC: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Hi, I think I'd favor keeping this transclusion page following [4] and make the deliverable angle come into play a bit later. Btw, [2] lacks the two(or three)-level hierarchy of [4]. Are we interested in keeping it? Antoine > I've started creating category pages for each topic [1] and > reorganising [2] so that it's just a transclusion of these category > pages. > I'm not sure I'll have the time in the coming days to finish the work > I've started, so anyone please feel free to continue ;-) > > I have a question : how is this page related with [3] ? Currently, [2] > is organised exactly like [4]. > I'm wondering if a "TopicsDiscussed" page shouldn't follow the new > organisation of topics we defined during the F2F. Wouldn't it help us > more with the first steps of the report ? > > Once the transclusion is completed, it will be fairly easy to > reorganise [2] following [3], if that's what we want to do. > > Emmanuelle > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Category:LLDTopics > [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/TopicsDiscussed > [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh_Outcomes#Use_cases_.26_Topics_9:00-10:30_.2B_11:00-12:30 > [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Topics > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Antoine Isaac<aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: >> >>> Transclusion does work on our wiki. >>> >>> Here's an example page. >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Transclusion_Test >>> Click 'edit' to look at the source and see how it's done. >>> >> >> >> Excellent! >> Thanks a lot, Jodi. I think this definitively sorts out how we should >> organize the topic pages on the wiki. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 23:02:12 UTC