- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:14:49 +0100
- To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi Jodi, > I know that we're overwhelmed with the existing use cases. But I'm wondering if we've got everything relevant? > > For instance, do we have use cases covering > * vocabulary services like HIVE [1] > * machine+computational uses > > Other missing topics? Add them to the list on the wiki [2], if you think of it. Maybe some were mentioned at the F2F? > > -Jodi > > [1] http://hive.nescent.org:9090/home.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Cases#Related_topics.2C_are_these_covered_yet.3F In fact I trust that vocabulary services will be covered: we discussed that extensively in the F2F, and one bit of the outcomes [3] reads: > DATA.VOCABS: need a use case for registries (RDA task group ?) So it's kind of registered as a to-do. One thing that we did not have the time to discuss in the F2F was whether we had complete coverage of the stuff appearing in the "use case notes" page [4]. Perhaps we should devote 10 minutes discussing that in a coming call, or via mail. Cheers, Antoine [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh_Outcomes#Things_that_should_be_covered_by_use_cases [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseNotes
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 16:14:52 UTC