- From: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 15:38:46 +0100
- To: "Mark van Assem" <mark@cs.vu.nl>, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Good point, clarifications here would help a lot. Unfortunately, vocabulary is quite taken by a wider semweb discussion and woven into community activities (e.g. VoCamp, http://vocamp.org/wiki/Main_Page). Not sure how deal with this. Cheers, Joachim > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Mark van Assem > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. November 2010 15:00 > An: Karen Coyle > Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org > Betreff: Re: SemWeb terminology page > > About terminology: > > I understand that FOAF, FRAD, ... are called "vocabularies" > by this group (although I would term them "schemas" or > "metadata schemas"). > > But what are AAT, LCSH, ... called, if not "vocabularies" (at > least I hope a separate term is reserved for terminological > resources). > > Mark > > On 29/10/2010 16:38, Karen Coyle wrote: > > sorry about that prior glitch. I have started the > terminology page for > > semantic web terms: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Semantic_Web_terminology > > > > and did one entry as an example. I will work on it as I > have time, but > > please step in and add what you can. Remember, this is to be > > explanations for novices, not formal definitions, so please be > > user-friendly. > > > > kc > > > > -- > Mark van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam > http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 14:39:23 UTC