- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:32:25 +0200
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Dear Karen, There is indeed more than this. It is indeed extremely bad practice to assign someone an action while she is not here, and we certainly not want to do that. As a matter of fact the action is on me to ask you. It should be perfectly clear that you can still refuse--everyone has her own agenda, be sure that the group would understand. Especially -- shame on them ;-) -- the participants of the call who did not volunteer, arguing that your deep understanding of the domain would make you the perfect candidate instead! Note that if I've been late asking because I committed to advance a bit that work before, and do a first cleaning before contacting you. Hoping that this would convince you to accept... This is not captured in the minutes, but still vivid in my mind. I will in fact try to come with something by tomorrow. I hope that will be ok for you! Cheers, Antoine PS: one thing that is perfectly captured in the minutes is the name of the man who came with the proposal in the first place ;-) http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/06/24-lld-minutes.html#action08 > Now I see why it is so important to attend the conference calls, since > in my absence last week I was given a task... to curate/organize the > topic list. > > Is there more to this than I should assume based on the minutes? Is it > considered an ongoing task? > > Thanks (I guess), > kc >
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 21:33:01 UTC