- From: William Waites <william.waites@okfn.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:52:33 +0100
- To: "public-xg-lld@w3.org" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
On 10-07-30 10:38, Jodi Schneider wrote: > "The URI should be included in the final version of the metadata" > > Is it useful to make some reasons clear? i.e. to explain why it is "a > valuable addition to the standard"? Or is that already clear to the > NISO I2 working group? How about: "Dereferencing the URI with an HTTP request is the simplest and most straightforward way to obtain a copy of the metadata" On URI vs. URL, does it make sense at all to suggest the registration of a urn namespace with IANA? Or do non-dereferenceable URIs like that just muddy the waters? Cheers, -w -- William Waites <william.waites@okfn.org> Mob: +44 789 798 9965 Open Knowledge Foundation Fax: +44 131 464 4948 Edinburgh, UK RDF Indexing, Clustering and Inferencing in Python http://ordf.org/
Received on Friday, 30 July 2010 09:54:06 UTC