- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:58:32 +0200
- CC: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi Kai, > And of course, I forgot the links... > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Template > [2] > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Authority_Data_Enrichment > [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Digital_Preservation > > Some additional remarks about my wiki changes: > > I rearranged the UseCases page a little bit and moved it to Use_Cases: > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Cases (UseCases is redirected) > I have copied the contents of Topics3 to Topics and marked Topics3 as > deprecated. Thanks for this! Btw, why moving UseCases? Was it a bad page name, wiki-wise? Best, Antoine > Kai Eckert schrieb: >> Hello all, >> >> Emmanuelle, Alexander and I finished our work on the redesign of the >> template based on two example use cases. The template [1], as well as >> the two use cases [2,3] can be found in the wiki. >> >> Beside some minor text clarifications, the main changes are as follows: >> >> * Additional section "Application of linked data": We needed this to >> separate the linked data specific content from the actual use case >> scenario. This should encourage contributors to really step back from >> the possible linked data implementation and think independently about >> the actual use case. >> >> * We moved the "Existing Work" section upwards, after the >> "Application of Linked Data" section: This should encourage another >> abstraction, we want to separate principle linked data solutions from >> actual solutions that might be used to fulfill the use case. >> >> In other words: Application of linked data should *not* describe library >> domain specific things. Existing work *should* describe library domain >> specific solutions. >> >> * Additional section "Related Vocabularies": Here we just gather >> information about vocabularies, which might be valuable for an overall >> report. >> >> The "Problems and Limitations" section should then be used to describe >> problems on all levels of the former sections: problems with the whole >> scenario, linked data specific problems, problems with existing works >> and/or vocabularies. >> >> * The section "Unanticipated Uses" is extended with "Related Use >> Cases" and can be used to group use cases together, as well as encourage >> new use cases. >> >> * The Section "Dimensions" is currently called Dimensions / Topics >> and has been moved to the end of the template: that was already >> suggested on the mailing list. As a preliminary result: The topics have >> to be cleaned up to use them for the use cases, they need at least >> shorter and clearer names and they should not overlap. The dimensions >> were not sufficient for the Digital Preservation use case and should be >> extended. >> >> * Additional section "References" >> >> Regarding the dimensions/topics, we think that we (the XG, not we three >> ;-)) should clean them up a little bit and then refine them later as we >> see the need. At the end of the gathering process, we have to rework the >> topics and dimensions anyway and make sure that they are in line with >> the then-available use cases. >> >> That's it, now we can continue the discussion about the template. >> >> Thanks to Emmanuelle and Alexander, the work with you was very >> productive and efficient (and pleasant!). And finally, I consider the >> following actions as DELIVERED, yeah! :-) >> >> [NEW] ACTION: Alexander, kai, emma to populate the template for use >> cases [recorded in >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#action03] >> [NEW] ACTION: stu, alexander, kai and emma to suggest another version of >> the template. [recorded in >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#action05] >> >> Regards, >> >> Kai >> >
Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 14:59:07 UTC