Re: Use case notes page

I think this leaves the first use case to be written, hopefully by someone besides Gordon & me:
> > * Link Social Bibliography to a Bibliographic Network

-Jodi

On 16 Dec 2010, at 20:54, gordon@gordondunsire.com wrote:

> Jodi
> 
> The second of these (closest collection) should be folded into Library Address Data use case, which is not clustered. This is part of the general area of collection-level description which I think will intersect with high-level provenance issues and (low-level) individual real-world objects (aka circulation control), in an LLD context. It also intersects, as you suggest in the third of your proposed use-cases, with the general area of availability/access. Access restrictions tend to be at the collection level (opening hours, loan period, intermediation tool required for format, licenses, user ability, etc.).
>  
> The specific issue of finding digital manifestations is already covered by the Open Library Data use case, part of the Bibliographic Data cluster.
>  
> Perhaps we could cluster your second and third proposed use cases with the submitted Library Address Data use case, and focus on  availability/access at the collection level? I'd be happy to collaborate ...
> 
> But not until the new year!
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Gordon
> 
>  
> On 16 December 2010 at 16:14 Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org> wrote:
> 
> > I see the need for these 3 use cases:
> >
> > * Link Social Bibliography to a Bibliographic Network
> > * Find materials in the closest physical collection (may include library and non-library collections)
> > * Find e-books or other digital materials, according to access restrictions (e.g. free, available in my geographic locale, etc)
> >
> > Would anyone like to collaborate on writing these use cases? Or can you suggest other groups that we might might write them?
> >
> > -Jodi
> >
> > On 11 Nov 2010, at 17:32, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jodi,
> > >
> > > Thanks. So you think that these items should definitely covered by more use cases? I was actually not sure that this was the case... Perhaps we have in fact already some cases for them, I just did not have the time to dive into what they were describing.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Antoine
> > >
> > >
> > >> I added 4 items to the 'things that should be covered by use cases' from
> > >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=UseCaseNotes&oldid=2128 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=UseCaseNotes&oldid=2128>
> > >>
> > >>    * *Link Social Bibliography to a Bibliographic Network*. Link reviews, tags, lists, cover art to a work. /This seems like a variation on the enrich a record use case./
> > >>    * *Find stuff in several collections*.Searching a specific set of library and non-library collections--for instance to find a given book or DVD, or get access to an article. I'm thinking about this first as a local area search with a specific set of libraries--but then also as a 'travel' awareness search (for the harder-to-find things I'm willing to go out of my way to find, while travelling). I'd love, for instance, a mashup between TripIt/Dopplr, my calendar of availability, and my LibraryThing wishlist -- alerting me to possibilities to use items I can't get locally when I have a free day out-of-town. Jodi Schneider <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/User:Jschneid4> 13:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC) /It seems that we don't have any such far-stretching case. Or this item rather calling for enabling mesh-ups, not doing them? (Antoine)/
> > >>    * *Find e-books* see http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2010/07/finding-ebooks.html
> > >>    * archives and linked data, knitting together multiple identifiers <http://inkdroid.org/journal/2010/08/12/archival-context-on-the-web/>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I can expand with more detail if it's helpful.
> > >>
> > >> -Jodi
> > >>
> > >> On 11 Nov 2010, at 10:38, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Dear all,
> > >>>
> > >>> I've started some clean-up of http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseNotes
> > >>> hoping that pretty soon we could just remove it from [1], as part of an attempt to have [2] as only one list of things that should motivate our searching for new cases.
> > >>>
> > >>> It's not yet dead, though. Feedback is welcome from these who created the non-deleted items: please declare them as dead of move them to [2]! We could discuss them in a next call whether we're interested enough to include them in the list we agreed upon at the F2F...
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>>
> > >>> Antoine
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCases#Related_topics.2C_are_these_covered_yet.3F
> > >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh_Outcomes#Things_that_should_be_covered_by_use_cases
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >

Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 22:32:01 UTC