Re: Use case notes page

Jodi, I think that this needs expressed in this email are already  
covered in the archives/heterogeneous use cases. Does anyone think  
that we need this specific issue written up as a new use case?

kc

Quoting Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>:

> There were four use cases left (not crossed out) here:
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=UseCaseNotes&oldid=2128
>
> Three I've already discussed in a separate email. The fourth of  
> these, I'll defer to the Archives/heterogeneous items group to  
> consider whether it's relevant. This came from one of Ed's blog  
> posts [1] , on the question of knitting together multiple identifiers:
>
>>>    * archives and linked data, knitting together multiple  
>>> identifiers  
>>> <http://inkdroid.org/journal/2010/08/12/archival-context-on-the-web/>
>
> -Jodi
>
> [1] http://inkdroid.org/journal/2010/08/12/archival-context-on-the-web/
>
> On 11 Nov 2010, at 17:32, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>
>> Hi Jodi,
>>
>> Thanks. So you think that these items should definitely covered by  
>> more use cases? I was actually not sure that this was the case...  
>> Perhaps we have in fact already some cases for them, I just did not  
>> have the time to dive into what they were describing.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>>> I added 4 items to the 'things that should be covered by use cases' from
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=UseCaseNotes&oldid=2128  
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=UseCaseNotes&oldid=2128>
>>>
>>>    * *Link Social Bibliography to a Bibliographic Network*. Link  
>>> reviews, tags, lists, cover art to a work. /This seems like a  
>>> variation on the enrich a record use case./
>>>    * *Find stuff in several collections*.Searching a specific set  
>>> of library and non-library collections--for instance to find a  
>>> given book or DVD, or get access to an article. I'm thinking about  
>>> this first as a local area search with a specific set of  
>>> libraries--but then also as a 'travel' awareness search (for the  
>>> harder-to-find things I'm willing to go out of my way to find,  
>>> while travelling). I'd love, for instance, a mashup between  
>>> TripIt/Dopplr, my calendar of availability, and my LibraryThing  
>>> wishlist -- alerting me to possibilities to use items I can't get  
>>> locally when I have a free day out-of-town. Jodi Schneider  
>>> <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/User:Jschneid4> 13:48,  
>>> 30 June 2010 (UTC) /It seems that we don't have any such  
>>> far-stretching case. Or this item rather calling for enabling  
>>> mesh-ups, not doing them? (Antoine)/
>>>    * *Find e-books* see  
>>> http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2010/07/finding-ebooks.html
>>>    * archives and linked data, knitting together multiple  
>>> identifiers  
>>> <http://inkdroid.org/journal/2010/08/12/archival-context-on-the-web/>
>>>
>>>
>>> I can expand with more detail if it's helpful.
>>>
>>> -Jodi
>>>
>>> On 11 Nov 2010, at 10:38, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I've started some clean-up of  
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseNotes
>>>> hoping that pretty soon we could just remove it from [1], as part  
>>>> of an attempt to have [2] as only one list of things that should  
>>>> motivate our searching for new cases.
>>>>
>>>> It's not yet dead, though. Feedback is welcome from these who  
>>>> created the non-deleted items: please declare them as dead of  
>>>> move them to [2]! We could discuss them in a next call whether  
>>>> we're interested enough to include them in the list we agreed  
>>>> upon at the F2F...
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Antoine
>>>>
>>>> [1]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCases#Related_topics.2C_are_these_covered_yet.3F
>>>> [2]  
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh_Outcomes#Things_that_should_be_covered_by_use_cases
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Received on Thursday, 16 December 2010 20:06:08 UTC