- From: Ford, Kevin <kefo@loc.gov>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:51:15 -0500
- To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
The minutes from today's telecon are available at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/12/02-lld-minutes.html
I've also pasted a text version below.
My gratitude to Antoine for bringing them the last mile.
Cheers,
Kevin
----------------
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
LLD XG
02 Dec 2010
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Dec/0006.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2010/12/02-lld-irc
Attendees
Present
antoine, jeff_, kai, michaelp, TomB, kefo, Asaf_, pmurray,
markva, edsu, digikim, rayd, Felix, danbri
Regrets
Ed, Jodi, Emmanuelle, Joachim, Guenther, Marcia
Chair
Tom
Scribe
Kefo
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Admin
2. [6]F2F in Cologne
3. [7]JISC Open Bibliographic Data Guide
4. [8]CITATION CLUSTER
5. [9]PAUL WALK'S TOOL AND ANALYSIS
6. [10]DRAFT OUTLINE FOR FINAL REPORT
* [11]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<TomB> Previous:
[12]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/11/25-lld-minu
tes.html
[12] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/11/25-lld-minutes.html
<TomB> Scribe: Kefo
<TomB> scribenick: kefo
Admin
RESOLUTION: Accept previous minutes
F2F in Cologne
Antoine: Small, informal mtg in Cologne
<antoine>
[13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Dec/0005.h
tml
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Dec/0005.html
Antoine: Talked about topics of incubator group
... and future outcomes of the group
... perhaps it would be best to review the written report
... distributed on the list serve.
... We spent a fair amount of time on
... establishing a shared terminology.
Tomb: let's discuss the issue of terminology
... but first attend to current agenda items
... maybe in next calls we establish shared terminology
tomb: should we continue with agenda and distribute notes by another
method
JISC Open Bibliographic Data Guide
antoine: participants believe it best to conduct conversation via
email
... and only later talk about specific items on calls
tomb:let's discuss in future calls
... keep placemarker for future calls
< ACTION: Monica and JISC colleagues to introduce and discuss JISC
work on next call [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-minutes.html#action02]CONTINUE
S]
[14] http://www.w3.org/2010/11/25-lld-minutes.html#action02
CITATION CLUSTER
<kai>
[15]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MhYl8Iz8raHA0M7jnHrzwiC_MmXn
DM4aNG2ymVCz9rM/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKzY3YQH
[15] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MhYl8Iz8raHA0M7jnHrzwiC_MmXnDM4aNG2ymVCz9rM/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKzY3YQH
kai: problems defining what was expected from cluster
... would like feedback from group
... began by defining a citation
... based on use cases, concluded needed a broader definition than
just something bibliographic
... discussed scope of cluster
... citing, citations, citation format, link/cite difference, and
backlinks in scope
... out of scope: defining new citation representations
... also identified citation granularity as relevant
... level 1 is a basic string in the text of a publication
... level 2 is a structured citation
... level 3 actually linked citation
... identified a few additional use cases
... ability to register agreeement/disagreement with citation
... and jumping to cited resource are two examples
<markva> this appears to overlap with Goals and Scenario (emma's
suggestion)
kai: next step is to extract requirements from these added use
cases.
... provided a section detailing existing technologies and
vocabularies that may be helpful moving forward
... also identified new questions that may need to be addressed
TomB: good start. I see a definition of citations in the scope of
linked data. What is the function of a citation in linked data and
how can that function be achieved?
... URIs are one way, but what other ways might there be to identify
citations in a linked data environment?
... I would expect citation cluster to frame the problem of what is
a citation in a LD context and then look at use cases to determine
the ways and methods that are employed to address problem.
kai: I'd like to take a step back and ask what we hope to achieve
with the documents we're producing about the clusters
<markva> +1
kai: We certainly need our own definition for citations in linked
data
TomB: It is important to start with defining a citation in light of
linked data and then go on to explore how that is manifested in the
use cases
... Why work in the Google Docs enviro versus XG wiki?
... Technical reason or a desire not to show work-in-progress?
<edsu> better for live editing ...
<jeff_> better for simultaneous collaborative editing
kai: We'll be moving to Wiki soon.
edsu: Thanks kai for thorough description of our work to-date. TomB,
I hear your concerns. In my mind, LD is a technology and one that
can be used to represent citations. But, w/o knowing what a citation
is in the absence of technology, we can't identify the needs for LD.
<TomB> +1 to define citations generically before saying what they
mean in the linked data context
markva: Lots of interesting material. procedural question: If you
merge into Wiki, will it break into different sections?
... What is the structure of the document we're all working toward
based on the clusters.
<antoine> I think the 'extracted use cases' are indeed Emma's
'scenarios'
TomB: Could be useful to have a scaffolding of subsections, with
idea that for final report we cut out superfluous sub-headings
markva: I don't know if I understand. We only have structure for use
cases.
TomB: Let's not worry about establishing a formal template for the
cluster reports right now.
TomB: I'm inclined to let groups develop a structure best-suited to
their findings
... Let's get it on paper and then determine areas of overlap and
ways to streamline the organization
edsu: I want to echo Mark's points.
... If there is a specific goal for the group, it would help the
groups focus their work.
<antoine> +1
<pmurray> I agree with edsu; more structure would have been helpful
for our conversation.
edsu: Otherwise, the disparity in the resulting documents might
require a great deal of massaging in the end.
antoine: I half agree with Ed. Having a structure is useful
... but we have really diverse clusters, it could be that for some
of them the structure differs
... Especially true for the vocabulary alignment cluster
... so we should perhaps still allow some flexibility now
<edsu> +1
<edsu> :-)
<kai> +1, but maybe we should have the presentation of a very
different cluster first to see the differences and similarities.
TomB: I believe groups need some latitude in creating their reports.
... But, perhaps, we could work to identify 3 or 4 headings that
might be shared across all the groups.
... Is this a reasonable compromise? We don't lose time defining a
template, but we do determine a few headings that apply across all
the clusters.
<pmurray> I agree, if it can be done at this point.
edsu: I think this would be useful, especially if we can identify
the 3 or 4 headings quickly
<markva> +1
edsu: This would help to provide some guidance to the others.
TomB: nearing the end. Anything else?
antoine: I have two headings: I like the Extracted Use Cases /
Scenarios section and the relevant technologies/vocabularies
section.
antoine: for a third, I like the background definitions. Such as, in
the citation example, how a citation is defined and its placement,
the intoductory section
edsu: Kai, Peter, and I can rework the document to fit the proposed
headings
<edsu> i have 1) Background 2) Topic in the Context of Linked Data
3) Scenarios (Extracted Use Cases) 4) Relevant Technologies
Vocabularies
ACTION: Citation cluster group to place Google Docs document into XG
Wiki [recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2010/12/02-lld-minutes.html#action01]
[16] http://www.w3.org/2010/12/02-lld-minutes.html#action01
<edsu> markva: would be interested to hear if this fits how you've
been thinking about it
PAUL WALK'S TOOL AND ANALYSIS
TomB: Must this remain on the agenda?
... I propose we remove it otherwise.
<Asaf_> +1
<edsu> +1
ACTION: Remove PAUL WALK'S TOOL AND ANALYSIS from Agenda [recorded
in [17]http://www.w3.org/2010/12/02-lld-minutes.html#action02]
[17] http://www.w3.org/2010/12/02-lld-minutes.html#action02
DRAFT OUTLINE FOR FINAL REPORT
<antoine>
[18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Dec/0005.h
tml
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Dec/0005.html
antoine: Two primary topics for the draft that we think we're
missing, related to education and outreach
... Firstly, we wanted to emphasize opportunities of LD for
libraries and other users. We need some scenarios demonstrating
_why_ a library would want to do LD
... Perhaps a type of benefits section at the front of report
... targeting library managers/administrators
... Secondly, was education. Guenther was interested in what the
curricula for professional training or the qualifications a library
professional would need for LD
... Guenther is going to establish a Wiki page for this.
<pmurray> That is huge, and important.
TomB: Propose we put an intro section into the report outline with
and a new Education/curricula section at the end of the report
<markva> bye
<danbri> yay, my first LLD call. all of 13 minutes!
<digikim> thanks
<TomB> ACTION: Antoine to add "LOD curriculum" into
"recommendations" section of Outline, and benefits into an
Introduction [recorded in
[19]http://www.w3.org/2010/12/02-lld-minutes.html#action03]
[19] http://www.w3.org/2010/12/02-lld-minutes.html#action03
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Antoine to add "LOD curriculum" into "recommendations"
section of Outline, and benefits into an Introduction [recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/12/02-lld-minu
tes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: Citation cluster group to place Google Docs document
into XG Wiki [recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/12/02-lld-minu
tes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Remove PAUL WALK'S TOOL AND ANALYSIS from Agenda
[recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/12/02-lld-minu
tes.html#action02]
[PENDING] ACTION: Monica and JISC colleagues to introduce and
discuss JISC work on next call [recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/11/25-lld-minu
tes.html#action02]
[PENDING] ACTION: volunteers to send login information to william
waite to curate CKAN [recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/11/25-lld-minu
tes.html#action04]
[PENDING] ACTION: Jeff to write one or two paragraphs on VIAF design
discussions [recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/11/18-lld-minu
tes.html#action06]
[PENDING] ACTION: Karen and Emma to curate archive cluster for end
of december [recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minu
tes.html#action02]
[PENDING] ACTION: Antoine and Michael to curate vocabulary alignment
cluster for end of december [recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minu
tes.html#action07]
[PENDING] ACTION: Gordon and Martin to curate bibliographic data
cluster for end of december [recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minu
tes.html#action05]
[PENDING] ACTION: Jeff and Alexander to curate authority data
cluster for end of december [recorded in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minu
tes.html#action06]
[PENDING] ACTION: Kai and Ed to curate citations cluster for end of
december [recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minu
tes.html#action03]
[PENDING] ACTION: Mark (and Jodi and Asaf) to curate digital objects
cluster for end of december [recorded in
[31]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minu
tes.html#action04]
[PENDING] ACTION: Alex, Jeff, Martin, MichaelP elaborate on general
purpose IT architecture for dealing with linked data with caching
feature [recorded in
[32]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/24‑lld‑minu
tes.html#action04]
[PENDING] ACTION: Emma and Antoine to create use case
DATA.SEARCH-OPTIMIZATION [recorded in
[33]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/24‑lld‑minu
tes.html#action06]
[PENDING] ACTION: for each use case champion: on the Vocabularies
page, link to each URL use case that uses it [recorded in
[34]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23‑lld‑minu
tes.html#action01]
[PENDING] ACTION: GordonD and Antoine to study use cases that relate
to vocabulary merging use case [recorded in
[35]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/24-lld-minu
tes.html#action01]
[23] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/11/25-lld-minutes.html#action02
[24] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/11/25-lld-minutes.html#action04
[25] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/11/18-lld-minutes.html#action06
[26] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minutes.html#action02
[27] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minutes.html#action07
[28] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minutes.html#action05
[29] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minutes.html#action06
[30] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minutes.html#action03
[31] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23-lld-minutes.html#action04
[32] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/24%E2%80%91lld%E2%80%91minutes.html#action04
[33] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/24%E2%80%91lld%E2%80%91minutes.html#action06
[34] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/23%E2%80%91lld%E2%80%91minutes.html#action01
[35] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/10/24-lld-minutes.html#action01
[End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 19:52:38 UTC