- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:40:37 -0500
- To: ext Glen Shires <gshires@google.com>
- CC: olli@pettay.fi, public-webapps@w3.org, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>, ext Satish S <satish@google.com>, Peter Beverloo <peter@chromium.org>
On 1/10/12 11:25 AM, ext Glen Shires wrote: > Per #4 Testing commitment(s): can you elaborate on what you would like > to see at this point? At this point, I think a `warm fuzzy` like "if/when the spec advances to Candidate Recommendation, we will contribute to a test suite that is sufficient to exit the CR" would be useful. > Also, what is the next step? WRT the API you proposed, I think we have enough preliminary feedback for me to start a CfC to add the API to WebApps charter. My only concern is the open question (at least to me) re the markup part. It seems like it would be useful to review the proposed API and markup together. However, a CfC for the markup can be done separately (provided sufficient interest/commitment is expressed). If I don't see any objection from Chaals or Doug, today or tomorrow I'll start a CfC for the API proposal . -AB
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 14:43:32 UTC