- From: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:46:35 -0400
- To: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
Group,
The minutes from today's call are available at http://www.w3.org/2011/09/15-htmlspeech-minutes.html.
For convenience, a text version is embedded below.
Thanks to Glen Shires (again) for taking the minutes.
-- dan
**********************************************************************************
HTML Speech Incubator Group Teleconference
15 Sep 2011
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep/0025.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2011/09/15-htmlspeech-irc
Attendees
Present
Dan_Burnett, Michael_Bodell, Olli_Pettay, Debbie_Dahl,
Bjorn_Bringert, Satish_Sampath, Robert_Brown,
Michael_Johnston
Regrets
Chair
Michael_Bodell
Scribe
Satish_Sampath, Glen_Shires
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Section 7
2. [6]Media Stream Input
3. [7]new meeting
* [8]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<mbodell>
[10]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep
/0026.html
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep/0026.html
Discussing draft
[11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep
/att-0008/speechwepapi.html
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep/att-0008/speechwepapi.html
Robert: in writing code, found using constructors wherever possible
simplifies it
... see code in
[12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep
/0026.html
... service query object, etc is overblown
... if remote service, then need to create a service object
... to pass into constructor of SpeechInput request
... (read the email for better description)
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep/0026.html
bringert: typically just want to use default ... or if want specific
speech service
... in either case, fundamentally same API
... two cases: default service or specific service. In either case,
ask for a feature and it either succeeds or fails.
burn: security/authentication is easier in this model
... not required for default
Olli: how to handle permissions (old api had error callback)
bringert: not getting permission is just another type of failure
... (permissions from user)
Robert: rather than overload constructor, use a 2-stage approach:
constructor + open function
... in open function: use this URI, use default, etc
... async callback "I'm ready"
... on SpeechInputRequest
bringert: create, open, start/initialize (3 steps)
Robert: can stack up language, grammar
bringert: create, open/initialize, start (3 steps)
... setup for remote servers
satish: start to set quality
... start to set qualities
... open callback indicates success/fail
<mbodell> I'm not sure createFoo is that unstandard. Check out
[13]https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification
.html#AudioContext-section for an example of an object with a lot of
createFoos
[13] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#AudioContext-section
satish: whether supports capabilities
mbodell: SpeechService
bringert: new SpeechService, SpeechService.Open
Robert: old days: classes to create objects, had twice as many
classes as needed
??1: what params in 3 steps?
bringert: create is constructor (no params or URL)
satish: or SpeechServiceObject
Robert: now I'm thinking a flat model, one object
bringert: open has success and error callbacks
... attributes, URI
... create, initialize, start - no arguments, only attributes
satish: same or different handlers?
... if tied to function call, should be params. if lifetime of
object, then attributes
<bringert> new SpeechinputRequest(), .init(success, error),
.start(success, error)
bringert: args should be: create(void), init(successcallback,
errorcallback), start(successCallback, errorCallback)
... set all params at once and check once if works
???: as Robert said, simplify common use case
<mbodell> s/\?\?\?:/Olli:/
Olli: can re-use a SpeechInputRequest object for different language>
bringert: should be .setlanguage then .init()
Olli: so no longer binding SpeechInputRequest to ??? -- permission
handling may be more ugly
Robert: permissions problem hasn't yet been solved in doc
... oh that permission, retract
mbodell: reco should have success/error callbacks - exact semantics
of .init/.start and what can change between them not clear yet
... old model: before .init, SpeechService completes before set
individual properties
bringert: we don't need .init, just let .start do it, and have
.willItWork()
satish: .start creates connection
mbodell: I think satish suggests start/reco and then state-change
callback
bringert: use case: can I show mic button - based on .willItWork()
mbodell: does .willItWork consider user permissions?
... don't want to prompt user to ask
bringert: yes, .willItWork() could contact server (and not send
data) and check if it technically will work (independent of user
permissions)
satish: service is third-party. Can browser inquire "do you
support?" Maybe if don't identify domain.
bringert: don't need .init, just .start and .canStart
... .init is not mandatory (because .start can call .init)
satish: .init is still there, developer can call it, but not
required to
bringert: so fewer callbacks need to be implemented
<bringert> new SpeechinputRequest(), .init(), .start() (calls init()
if not called already)
<bringert> callbacks are attributes (event handlers) on
SpeechInputRequest
<mbodell> and some results and errors are DOM events (which may have
onevent handlers)
bringert: .start() may call .init()
burn: simplifies what the developer is required to do
Robert: someone should volunteer to write sample code and then IDL
mbodell: about to ask for a volunteer
... at least to level of other proposals
satish: I volunteer
Robert: first a code sample, then IDL
mbodell: so this changes sections 3 and 4
Section 7
satish: attributes for grammars
ddahl: what if URI changes after set grammar object
??3: sevice may load at call time, so if changes in meantime,
service may not load until next invocation
ddahl: what if content of URI changes after set grammar object
bringert: URI may point to a dynamic resource, so for every reco
request, the service should check to see if changed
mbodell: setting it doesn't freeze the content. service does HTTP
for fetching/caching/etc
satish: service may cache when setGrammar
burn: service is responsible for fetching/caching -- not the browser
bringert: use semantics of URI to fetch and cache (for example, HTTP
has semantics)
burn: author may have a way to update, but not part of browser's job
mbodell: that covers grammars, moving on to other parameters
satish: object.set...
mbodell: name/value string, can be more than one
<Charles> Consider JSON: [14]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON
[14] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON
satish: is that more useful than one custom field
<mbodell> change setParameter to setCustomParameter
MJ: create new SpeechInputRequest then .setGrammar -- does this
require communication with speech service to set up
mbodell: semantics are collect info then talk to speech service
MJ: request grammar to be activated before start audio
<mbodell> s/\?\?4:/MJ:/g
mbodell: .init may do this
... so when call .start(), it's ready
... main use case: grammars can take a long time, so improves
latency when call .start()
... MRCP (and others) allow defining grammars early
bringert: .addGrammar, .addGrammar .init(), then .start()
burn: change grammars?
mbodell: reInit?
bringert: .addGrammar and .activateGramar
... specifying grammar, and starting to use grammar
mbodell: example .addGrammar, .init, .addGrammar, .start
satish: why allow that?
mbodell: some initialized, not others
bringert: so .start could call .init again
mbodell: some params shouldn't change after .init (like URI), but
(in my mind) some should (like timeout)
... .init connects to service (handles those issues), but shouldn't
tie down other params
bringert: close (inert), pause, resume
... hard to remember what can change when, so my preference if
anything gets changed between .init and .start, then .init gets
called again
... in close state can change anything, in pause state can change
some things and .init gets called again, in run state things don't
change immediately
Robert: not everything can be changed
bringert: some changes may affect user-consent
... perhaps split params (service UI and everything else) or just
one bunch, would be hard to remember more categories
... service UI could be only in constructor object
MJ: set up service in beginning, then user interaction later
... if set up a bunch of params, then change service
mbodell: changing URI can change permission model
<smaug> Argh, I run out of skype credits
mbodell: a separate SpeechInputRequest may be cleaner
<mbodell> make clear in doc that only init and start/reco actually
communicate with server
Media Stream Input
mbodell: does .start mean start at this point, or is it buffered?
satish: permissions model may handle media capture differently than
contacting speech service
mbodell: media capture permissions might encompass both
bringert: separate issue of sending data to a third party
burn: that's the point at which contact the speech service
mbodell: any agreement on if set up streaming, but haven't set up
reco, does it buffer?
<mbodell>
[15]http://hg.mozilla.org/users/rocallahan_mozilla.com/specs/raw-fil
e/tip/StreamProcessing/StreamProcessing.html#mediastream-extensions
[15] http://hg.mozilla.org/users/rocallahan_mozilla.com/specs/raw-file/tip/StreamProcessing/StreamProcessing.html#mediastream-extensions
bringert: if file, always beginning of file, if live (real-time like
microphone) then no buffering
... if want to buffer, developer can write code to do that
mbodell: so agree: no buffer
<mbodell> no buffer for media stream, we start the reco when the
start/reco is called, and it starts listening to the stream only
then
bringert: yes, audio api may have own buffering, or could even use
javascript
new meeting
burn: Olli asked me at beginning if a meeting at TPAC
... even if wrapped up this report, we may have more to discuss
... unlikely a formal meeting/discussion, but may be
useful/relevant/informal discussions
mbodell: and maybe formal if needed
burn: may have to slip call schedule out a week
mbodell: and document
burn: that's it, next call is next week, thanks everyone
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 17:47:15 UTC