- From: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:46:35 -0400
- To: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
Group, The minutes from today's call are available at http://www.w3.org/2011/09/15-htmlspeech-minutes.html. For convenience, a text version is embedded below. Thanks to Glen Shires (again) for taking the minutes. -- dan ********************************************************************************** HTML Speech Incubator Group Teleconference 15 Sep 2011 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep/0025.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/09/15-htmlspeech-irc Attendees Present Dan_Burnett, Michael_Bodell, Olli_Pettay, Debbie_Dahl, Bjorn_Bringert, Satish_Sampath, Robert_Brown, Michael_Johnston Regrets Chair Michael_Bodell Scribe Satish_Sampath, Glen_Shires Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Section 7 2. [6]Media Stream Input 3. [7]new meeting * [8]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <mbodell> [10]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep /0026.html [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep/0026.html Discussing draft [11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep /att-0008/speechwepapi.html [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep/att-0008/speechwepapi.html Robert: in writing code, found using constructors wherever possible simplifies it ... see code in [12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep /0026.html ... service query object, etc is overblown ... if remote service, then need to create a service object ... to pass into constructor of SpeechInput request ... (read the email for better description) [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Sep/0026.html bringert: typically just want to use default ... or if want specific speech service ... in either case, fundamentally same API ... two cases: default service or specific service. In either case, ask for a feature and it either succeeds or fails. burn: security/authentication is easier in this model ... not required for default Olli: how to handle permissions (old api had error callback) bringert: not getting permission is just another type of failure ... (permissions from user) Robert: rather than overload constructor, use a 2-stage approach: constructor + open function ... in open function: use this URI, use default, etc ... async callback "I'm ready" ... on SpeechInputRequest bringert: create, open, start/initialize (3 steps) Robert: can stack up language, grammar bringert: create, open/initialize, start (3 steps) ... setup for remote servers satish: start to set quality ... start to set qualities ... open callback indicates success/fail <mbodell> I'm not sure createFoo is that unstandard. Check out [13]https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification .html#AudioContext-section for an example of an object with a lot of createFoos [13] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#AudioContext-section satish: whether supports capabilities mbodell: SpeechService bringert: new SpeechService, SpeechService.Open Robert: old days: classes to create objects, had twice as many classes as needed ??1: what params in 3 steps? bringert: create is constructor (no params or URL) satish: or SpeechServiceObject Robert: now I'm thinking a flat model, one object bringert: open has success and error callbacks ... attributes, URI ... create, initialize, start - no arguments, only attributes satish: same or different handlers? ... if tied to function call, should be params. if lifetime of object, then attributes <bringert> new SpeechinputRequest(), .init(success, error), .start(success, error) bringert: args should be: create(void), init(successcallback, errorcallback), start(successCallback, errorCallback) ... set all params at once and check once if works ???: as Robert said, simplify common use case <mbodell> s/\?\?\?:/Olli:/ Olli: can re-use a SpeechInputRequest object for different language> bringert: should be .setlanguage then .init() Olli: so no longer binding SpeechInputRequest to ??? -- permission handling may be more ugly Robert: permissions problem hasn't yet been solved in doc ... oh that permission, retract mbodell: reco should have success/error callbacks - exact semantics of .init/.start and what can change between them not clear yet ... old model: before .init, SpeechService completes before set individual properties bringert: we don't need .init, just let .start do it, and have .willItWork() satish: .start creates connection mbodell: I think satish suggests start/reco and then state-change callback bringert: use case: can I show mic button - based on .willItWork() mbodell: does .willItWork consider user permissions? ... don't want to prompt user to ask bringert: yes, .willItWork() could contact server (and not send data) and check if it technically will work (independent of user permissions) satish: service is third-party. Can browser inquire "do you support?" Maybe if don't identify domain. bringert: don't need .init, just .start and .canStart ... .init is not mandatory (because .start can call .init) satish: .init is still there, developer can call it, but not required to bringert: so fewer callbacks need to be implemented <bringert> new SpeechinputRequest(), .init(), .start() (calls init() if not called already) <bringert> callbacks are attributes (event handlers) on SpeechInputRequest <mbodell> and some results and errors are DOM events (which may have onevent handlers) bringert: .start() may call .init() burn: simplifies what the developer is required to do Robert: someone should volunteer to write sample code and then IDL mbodell: about to ask for a volunteer ... at least to level of other proposals satish: I volunteer Robert: first a code sample, then IDL mbodell: so this changes sections 3 and 4 Section 7 satish: attributes for grammars ddahl: what if URI changes after set grammar object ??3: sevice may load at call time, so if changes in meantime, service may not load until next invocation ddahl: what if content of URI changes after set grammar object bringert: URI may point to a dynamic resource, so for every reco request, the service should check to see if changed mbodell: setting it doesn't freeze the content. service does HTTP for fetching/caching/etc satish: service may cache when setGrammar burn: service is responsible for fetching/caching -- not the browser bringert: use semantics of URI to fetch and cache (for example, HTTP has semantics) burn: author may have a way to update, but not part of browser's job mbodell: that covers grammars, moving on to other parameters satish: object.set... mbodell: name/value string, can be more than one <Charles> Consider JSON: [14]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON [14] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON satish: is that more useful than one custom field <mbodell> change setParameter to setCustomParameter MJ: create new SpeechInputRequest then .setGrammar -- does this require communication with speech service to set up mbodell: semantics are collect info then talk to speech service MJ: request grammar to be activated before start audio <mbodell> s/\?\?4:/MJ:/g mbodell: .init may do this ... so when call .start(), it's ready ... main use case: grammars can take a long time, so improves latency when call .start() ... MRCP (and others) allow defining grammars early bringert: .addGrammar, .addGrammar .init(), then .start() burn: change grammars? mbodell: reInit? bringert: .addGrammar and .activateGramar ... specifying grammar, and starting to use grammar mbodell: example .addGrammar, .init, .addGrammar, .start satish: why allow that? mbodell: some initialized, not others bringert: so .start could call .init again mbodell: some params shouldn't change after .init (like URI), but (in my mind) some should (like timeout) ... .init connects to service (handles those issues), but shouldn't tie down other params bringert: close (inert), pause, resume ... hard to remember what can change when, so my preference if anything gets changed between .init and .start, then .init gets called again ... in close state can change anything, in pause state can change some things and .init gets called again, in run state things don't change immediately Robert: not everything can be changed bringert: some changes may affect user-consent ... perhaps split params (service UI and everything else) or just one bunch, would be hard to remember more categories ... service UI could be only in constructor object MJ: set up service in beginning, then user interaction later ... if set up a bunch of params, then change service mbodell: changing URI can change permission model <smaug> Argh, I run out of skype credits mbodell: a separate SpeechInputRequest may be cleaner <mbodell> make clear in doc that only init and start/reco actually communicate with server Media Stream Input mbodell: does .start mean start at this point, or is it buffered? satish: permissions model may handle media capture differently than contacting speech service mbodell: media capture permissions might encompass both bringert: separate issue of sending data to a third party burn: that's the point at which contact the speech service mbodell: any agreement on if set up streaming, but haven't set up reco, does it buffer? <mbodell> [15]http://hg.mozilla.org/users/rocallahan_mozilla.com/specs/raw-fil e/tip/StreamProcessing/StreamProcessing.html#mediastream-extensions [15] http://hg.mozilla.org/users/rocallahan_mozilla.com/specs/raw-file/tip/StreamProcessing/StreamProcessing.html#mediastream-extensions bringert: if file, always beginning of file, if live (real-time like microphone) then no buffering ... if want to buffer, developer can write code to do that mbodell: so agree: no buffer <mbodell> no buffer for media stream, we start the reco when the start/reco is called, and it starts listening to the stream only then bringert: yes, audio api may have own buffering, or could even use javascript new meeting burn: Olli asked me at beginning if a meeting at TPAC ... even if wrapped up this report, we may have more to discuss ... unlikely a formal meeting/discussion, but may be useful/relevant/informal discussions mbodell: and maybe formal if needed burn: may have to slip call schedule out a week mbodell: and document burn: that's it, next call is next week, thanks everyone
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 17:47:15 UTC