Re: updated final report draft

Actually, I didn't notice that you had moved the addGrammar* methods onto the new collection object itself.  I agree that we need a new object for the collection and will do that, but I want to hear from others before I move the addGrammar* methods into that collection from the SpeechReco object/interface.

-- dan

On Nov 13, 2011, at 12:53 AM, Dan Burnett wrote:

> Agreed.  I will apply this change when I convert the arrays to collections throughout.
> 
> -- dan
> 
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Satish S wrote:
> 
>> o API Issue 5 (http://bantha.org/~mbodell/speechxg/issuew5.html):
>> Brought back the grammar/parameter functions.  This involved uncommenting the functions/explanations, adding a new one for grammarString, and renaming and rewording appropriately.
>> 
>> A minor/cosmetic suggestion - it would be cleaner to have a separate interface. See http://www.w3.org/TR/domcore/#domtokenlist for inspiration.
>> 
>>     interface SpeechGrammar {
>>         attribute DOMString src;
>>         attribute float weight;
>>     };
>> 
>>     interface SpeechGrammarList {
>>         readonly attribute unsigned long length;
>>         getter SpeechGrammar item(unsigned long index);
>>         void addGrammarUri(in DOMString src, optional float weight);
>>         void addGrammarString(in DOMString string, optional float weight);
>>     }
>> 
>>     interface SpeechReco {
>>         SpeechGrammarList grammars;
>>         ...
>>     }
>> 
>> --
>> Cheers
>> Satish
>